Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikipedia"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 54652 by 188.163.31.19 (Talk))
 
(38 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Good question actually. I'm not sure. I assumed that it was because it said so in the refferences section, but i don't have any information beyond that. {{user:beta_m/sig}}
 
Good question actually. I'm not sure. I assumed that it was because it said so in the refferences section, but i don't have any information beyond that. {{user:beta_m/sig}}
  
:Perhaps you got confused by the fact that "Wikipedia" is in the title of the article?  The references section had a link to an article at develop.consumerism.org. [[User:a|a]] 00:36, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
+
:Perhaps you got confused by the fact that "Wikipedia" is in the title of the article?  The references section had a link to an article at develop.consumerism.org. [[User:e★f|e★f]] 00:36, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
==This is ''not'' [[vandalism]]==
 +
Cool, I am editing "wikipedia"! [[User:YourLocalVandal|YourLocalVandal]] 14:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 +
*Good on ya mate for "not" vandalising. [[User:Mathmo|Mathmo]] 14:26, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
==I've a question for those running this site.==
 +
I have my own site critical of Wikipedia. It's: IHateWikipediaDOTcom. Is it something worth mentioning on this page? I've learned from Wikipedia to be cautious about mentioning it. [[User:12.214.202.204|12.214.202.204]] 17:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 +
:I looked at your site... must say it's nothing spectacular, but put it in. If there will be something terribly objectionable, then somebody can remove it. &nbsp;~&nbsp;[[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA!&nbsp;V&nbsp;Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit&section=new}} Talk]</sup></span> [[2007]] [[May 24]] 18:33 <sub>([[Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]])</sub>
 +
 
 +
== Funny? ==
 +
Bomis " ''pornography ring - [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/17/jimmy_wales_shot_dead_says_wikipedia/ Wikipedia founder 'shot by friend of Siegenthaler']'' ''The Register'' " removed by [[User:Anarchangel|Anarchangel]] 08:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:15, 4 September 2012

Was this Wikipedia article[edit]

Good question actually. I'm not sure. I assumed that it was because it said so in the refferences section, but i don't have any information beyond that. User:Beta m/sig

Perhaps you got confused by the fact that "Wikipedia" is in the title of the article? The references section had a link to an article at develop.consumerism.org. e★f 00:36, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

This is not vandalism[edit]

Cool, I am editing "wikipedia"! YourLocalVandal 14:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Good on ya mate for "not" vandalising. Mathmo 14:26, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I've a question for those running this site.[edit]

I have my own site critical of Wikipedia. It's: IHateWikipediaDOTcom. Is it something worth mentioning on this page? I've learned from Wikipedia to be cautious about mentioning it. 12.214.202.204 17:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

I looked at your site... must say it's nothing spectacular, but put it in. If there will be something terribly objectionable, then somebody can remove it.  ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) Talk 2007 May 24 18:33 (UTC)

Funny?[edit]

Bomis " pornography ring - Wikipedia founder 'shot by friend of Siegenthaler' The Register " removed by Anarchangel 08:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)