|
|
| (157 intermediate revisions by 68 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | With old rewrite rules it was not possible to upload files. With new it is possible. You will see links like ".../index.php/some_page", but it is possible to type "http://deu.anarchopedia.org/some page" and your url will be rewritten to "http;//deu.anarchopedia.org/index.php/some_page". When we would have some faster machines or some better MediaWiki code, we would have "nice urls", too. --[[User:millosh|millosh]] 05:32, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
| + | Why's there so much conspiracy nonsense on the main page? Especially because it's so ill-informed, stupid (Boko Haram means Western education is sinful, why advertise Western education then huh huh, checkmate) and factually incorrect (BH was close to taking over the country, yeah right, they control like a small part of North-Eastern Nigeria). I'll remove it.[[User:Godoftheinternets|Godoftheinternets]] 11:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC) |
| − | | + | |
| − | i don't get the sense of the featured articel [[Anarchopedia:troll]]
| + | |
| − | this is vandalism, isn't it? --[[User:83.64.198.175|83.64.198.175]] 14:16, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Doesn't look like vandalism to me. No page history. Yet perhaps, a misunderstanding. --[[User:atotland|Anni]] 07:03, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==QUESTION, JESUS CHRIST==
| + | |
| − | I added this edit like a YEAR AGO, or something like that. And I'm going to point it out again. From the main page:
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''If you can't understand English, use the this page to choose your own language.'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | IF YOU CAN'T UNDERSTAND ENGLISH, YOU CAN'T READ THAT TEXT. SO WTF IS THE POINT OF EXPLAINING? ROFLCOPTER. [[User:71.246.245.50|71.246.245.50]] 08:33, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Spammers ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Is anyone against implementation of SpamBlacklist extension with initial Wikimedia-CreativeCommons list? --[[User:Millosh|Milos Rancic]] 08:02, 26 May 2005 (CDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | If no one has anything against in the next seven days, I'll implement it on Meta. (I am asking all communities for that: i.e. people from Meta, [[:deu:]], [[:eng:]] and [[:fra:]]. I'll implement it on [http://hrv.anarchopedia.org/ hrv:]] because I don't think that my friend Marko has anything against it.) --[[User:Millosh|Milos Rancic]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Forum ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | (From Meta:) [[:fra:User:Blackat|Blackat]] from French Anarchopedia asked me to open forum. I didn't open under anarchopedia.org, but I opened one multilingual forum (phpBB2) on http://forum.anarhija.org/ . If anynone thinks that it is useful, please use it. --[[User:Millosh|Milos Rancic]] 08:22, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == "Anarchy," but registration required to contribute? ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | It seems like a gross contradiction in principle to require registration with a central database in order to contribute to a supposedly anarchic project. How can this possibly be justified? If the answer is "to avoid vandalism," isn't that massively hypocritical, given that that's the exact answer oligarchists and every other sort of pro-government political theorists would proffer to the question of why centralized government is necessary?
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Crypto-anarchists are having a good laugh at this project.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | :[[mediawiki]] sucks, as it requires a central database, but at the moment it is the state of the art for wiki sites. Requiring registration was a measure adopted to counter spam from scripts (I don't agree with it also, as it may discourage some contributors). [[User:rev 22|rev 22]] 22:19, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | :A few more things, for registering you are not required to provide your real name or an email. You can also use an account without an hidden password like [[User:a]] did (user name and password are the same). Using IPs doesn't provide real anonymity. [[User:rev 22|rev 22]] 01:14, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ::Would it be possible to allow unregistered users to contribute but have some sort of image with text in it and a text field in which they must type what is in the image, to prevent bots from editing? While I agree that requiring registration isn't ideal, registering provides a ''hell of a lot'' more anonymity for the contributor, since the IP address is hidden. [[User:Olive|Olive]] 18:27, 23 Feb 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | :::I don't think that this would be a normal [[Media Wiki]] behaviour, that's requre a little [[hacking]] of the [[source code|code]]. {{User:beta_m/sig}}
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ::::Regisration IS NOT required. I didnt register, and look, im editing a page.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ::::: as you see, SOME anarchist don't change anything, they just addapt themselves in existing rules, behavior: "You are not logged in. Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history." clear spying. therefore, I will maybe contribute but only from libraries. not because I am paranoic than because I don't want to accept spying.
| + | |
| − | :::::: Your IP is always logged on every site you go to. If you donot want your IP to be shown in teh recentchanges list, just use a proxy , tor ur get an account here. --[[User:Blackredisbeautiful|Blackredisbeautiful]] 14:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Access for non-english-speaking peoples ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | IMHO is it a bad way, writing in a text in english how to change the language. If someone does not understand english, he_she will even not understand how to change the language of the anarchopedia-site.
| + | |
| − | It seems to be better, if there will be a list at the left side of the page as in the wikipedia or the german version of the anarchopedia.
| + | |
| − | --[[User:farnpflanze|farnpflanze]] 20:37, 28 Jan 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | :Thanks for the suggestion, I have added the links on the left side as on deu.anarchopedia (these are called ''interwiki links''). [[User:a|Anonymous]] 21:28, 28 Jan 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == reorganizing the main page ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The Main Page is very overwhelming in my opinion. I think there are way too many links. In fact, I'm a bit puzzled by the Equipment for Life page in general. What exactly is the intent in that section? I would recommend something simpler such as what is happening at infoshop.org's [http://www.infoshop.org encylopedia]
| + | |
| − | respectfully,
| + | |
| − | Clay
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | P.S. I made an example of what I'm thinking- [[Test Main Page]]
| + | |
| − | :I think [[deu:Hauptseite|deu]], [[fra:|fra]] and [[pol:|pol]], habe really nice Main Pages why don`t use them as an inspiration? --[[User:Blackredisbeautiful|Blackredisbeautiful]] 11:33, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | == excuse me ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | are you those guys that wander around complaining about everything since the world was created but no one really cares and people do what they want as if you didn't even exist?
| + | |
| − | children i'm sorry but look at you with a website and all this blablabla and searching engine and stuff, you're doing just the same thing those you complain so much about do. admit children, you're going nowhere 'cause you got nowhere to go, you just having fun pissing people off. it's impossible to live in anarchy. sorry if i broke your little hearts. an exemple is that someone is going to attack me here (or not 'cause i said this) because i said what i think. or anyway, you got leadership, ideology and exemples to follow just like nazis and/or animals and are violent with those who disagree just like fascists and/or jesus, and that's why people laugh at you.
| + | |
| − | :I hope you won't consider my reply an "attack":
| + | |
| − | :*this website ([[Anarchopedia]]) is an experiment in anarchy, but it is not run by an affinity group or closed circle of anarchists, anybody can partecipate;
| + | |
| − | :*many, probably most anarchists today are pacifists or non-violent. I personally consider that violations of the basic human rights and violence are unacceptable, unless for self defense when all other means have been exhausted. [[User:Rev 22|''Rev 22'']] 16:37, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == anarcho-philosophy ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | hey people, I am a new Anarchist in the elite of philosophical anarchism. i was wondering if u people would like some neologsim? tell me what you think, alrgight...cause i created some neologism articles in wikipedia, and would like readers to spread the NEWS! --[[User:L O R D X101|L O R D X101]] 23:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[[User:Xinyu]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | :I am personally interested in it. I think we need neologisms to catalyze and boost the revolution ;). ~[[User:Rev 22|''Rev 22'']] 13:12, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
| + | |
Why's there so much conspiracy nonsense on the main page? Especially because it's so ill-informed, stupid (Boko Haram means Western education is sinful, why advertise Western education then huh huh, checkmate) and factually incorrect (BH was close to taking over the country, yeah right, they control like a small part of North-Eastern Nigeria). I'll remove it.Godoftheinternets 11:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
