Talk:LS Studio

Discussion thread: destination of the article

Please write here whether if this article should be conserved or deleted. Please explain yourself with well-founded reasons.

LS Studio's article deletion

Have an idea the time this article lasted here and now you just delete it without asking for opinions or suggestions like if you were the owher of Anarchopedia?

Since there has not been any discussion about. I will restore the article and open a discussion thread in order to determinate what other users believe plus a ban telling that it has been proposed for deletion.

Please, do not delete articles just because you don't like it or you believe are not appropiated. Remember that your thoughts are not worlwide ones!

Lsmodelclub

The time something is up, does not guarantee protection. I deleted this article not out of a desire for power or because "ownership of apedia", but because my concience left me not other choice. I would have deleted fascist propaganda if I could, and would it have been as old as the wiki itself.

The time this was up, and the cooperation of people wrting here regularly is the only reason I even argue with you... because I am just shocked by this and this needs to be adressed.

Concerning anarchist terms: ths is an absolute veto from me as a member of this community which declares itself anarchist - means to struggle for an end to dominance, discriminaton and exploitaton. Because this page does not fit in with this direction, but against it.

I don't have to wait for "anarchist authorities" or the community to allow the deletion. We will discuss it here, but the article will not stay there until it is severly changed (away with the whole production catalogue and all its elements, clearly outspoken against child porn and studios producing it).

• sexual exploitation of children is most clearly a transgression against nearly any anarchist value.

The power imbalance in relations between children and adults is obvious. Especially in the public sexualization of children.

People who confuse the struggle for freedom with the freedom to exploit others, have no place in the anarchist movement.

• there is a catalogue of titled films making them searchable, the information given is mostly useful to consumers of the studios products.
• there is not even critique aside the "freedom of the arts" blabla, citing only the studio itself. There is not even a clear position against child pornography, it is a "controversy". The whole text is a seemingly neutral to positive portrayal and with this advertising the studio.

And so is even your nickname, this makes me want to vomit.

• this was deleted on the spanish anarchopedia already. I propose for similar reasons as here. Were these also people acting as "owners of anarchopedia" or anarchists that chose not to be indifferent towards exploitaton. The sexualization of children is by any means not a "victimless crime", in this case there are hundreds of children who are exploited in reality and being profited from. Not concerning the fact, that a very relevant social taboo is broken up. It is by any means not censorship to claim that children should not be sex objects for adults. Krähe