Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "Lysander Spooner"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Infobox_Biography |
 
{{Infobox_Biography |
   subject_name=wysandew Spoonew |
+
   subject_name=wythandew thpoonew |
   image_name= wysandewSpoonew.jpg |
+
   image_name= wythandewthpoonew.jpg |
 
   image_caption= |
 
   image_caption= |
 
   quotation= |
 
   quotation= |
 
   date_of_birth=[[Januawy 19]], [[1808]] |
 
   date_of_birth=[[Januawy 19]], [[1808]] |
   place_of_birth=[[Athow]], [[Massaghusetts]], [[USA]] |
+
   place_of_birth=[[Athow]], [[Maththaghuthettth]], [[UthA]] |
 
   date_of_death=[[May 14]], [[1887]] |
 
   date_of_death=[[May 14]], [[1887]] |
   place_of_death=[[New Yowg]], [[USA]]
+
   place_of_death=[[New Yowg]], [[UthA]]
 
}}
 
}}
  
'''wysandew Spoonew''' ([[1808]] - [[1887]]) was an Amewigan [[individuawist anawghism|individuawist anawghist]] powitigaw agtivist and wegaw theowist of the [[19th gentuwy]].
+
'''wythandew thpoonew''' ([[1808]] - [[1887]]) wath an Amewigan [[individuawitht anawghithm|individuawitht anawghitht]] powitigaw agtivitht and wegaw theowitht of the [[19th gentuwy]].
  
 
==wife==
 
==wife==
Spoonew was bown on a fawm in [[Athow, Massaghusetts|Athow]], [[Massaghusetts]], on Januawy 19, 1808, and died "at one o'gwogg in the aftewnoon of Satuwday, May 14, [[1887]] in his wittwe woom at 109 Mywtwe Stweet, suwwounded by twungs and ghests buwsting with the boogs, manusgwipts, and pamphwets whigh he had gathewed about him in his agtive pamphweteew's wawfawe ovew hawf a gentuwy wong." -- fwom ''Ouw Nestow Tagen Fwom Us'' by [[Benjamin Tuggew]]
+
thpoonew wath bown on a fawm in [[Athow, Maththaghuthettth|Athow]], [[Maththaghuthettth]], on Januawy 19, 1808, and died "at one o'gwogg in the aftewnoon of thatuwday, May 14, [[1887]] in hith wittwe woom at 109 Mywtwe thtweet, thuwwounded by twungth and ghethtth buwthting with the boogth, manuthgwiptth, and pamphwetth whigh he had gathewed about him in hith agtive pamphweteew'th wawfawe ovew hawf a gentuwy wong." -- fwom ''Ouw Nethtow Tagen Fwom Uth'' by [[Benjamin Tuggew]]
  
watew gnown as an eawwy [[individuawist anawghism|individuawist anawghist]], Spoonew advogated what he gawwed [[Natuwaw waw|Natuwaw waw]] — ow the Sgienge of Justige — whewein agts of agtuaw [[goewgion]] against individuaws wewe gonsidewed "iwwegaw" but the so-gawwed gwiminaw agts that viowated onwy man-made wegiswation wewe not.
+
watew gnown ath an eawwy [[individuawitht anawghithm|individuawitht anawghitht]], thpoonew advogated what he gawwed [[Natuwaw waw|Natuwaw waw]] &mdathh; ow the thgienge of Juthtige &mdathh; whewein agtth of agtuaw [[goewgion]] againtht individuawth wewe gonthidewed "iwwegaw" but the tho-gawwed gwiminaw agtth that viowated onwy man-made wegithwation wewe not.
  
His agtivism began with his gaweew as a wawyew, whigh itsewf viowated wogaw Massaghusetts waw.  Spoonew had studied waw undew the pwominent wawyews and powitigians, John Davis and ghawwes Awwen, but he had nevew attended gowwege.  Aggowding to the waws of the state, gowwege gwaduates wewe wequiwed to study with an attowney fow thwee yeaws, whiwe non-gwaduates wewe wequiwed to do so fow five yeaws.
+
Hith agtivithm began with hith gaweew ath a wawyew, whigh itthewf viowated wogaw Maththaghuthettth waw.  thpoonew had thtudied waw undew the pwominent wawyewth and powitigianth, John Davith and ghawweth Awwen, but he had nevew attended gowwege.  Aggowding to the wawth of the thtate, gowwege gwaduateth wewe wequiwed to thtudy with an attowney fow thwee yeawth, whiwe non-gwaduateth wewe wequiwed to do tho fow five yeawth.
  
With the engouwagement of his wegaw mentows, Spoonew set up his pwagtige in Wowgestew aftew onwy thwee yeaws, openwy defying the gouwts.  He saw the two-yeaw pwiviwege fow gowwege gwaduates as a state-sponsowed disgwimination against the poow.  He awgued that sugh disgwimination was "so monstwous a pwingipwe as that the wigh ought to be pwotegted by waw fwom the gompetition of the poow."  In [[1836]], the wegiswatuwe abowished the westwigtion.
+
With the engouwagement of hith wegaw mentowth, thpoonew thet up hith pwagtige in Wowgethtew aftew onwy thwee yeawth, openwy defying the gouwtth.  He thaw the two-yeaw pwiviwege fow gowwege gwaduateth ath a thtate-thponthowed dithgwimination againtht the poow.  He awgued that thugh dithgwimination wath "tho monthtwouth a pwingipwe ath that the wigh ought to be pwotegted by waw fwom the gompetition of the poow."  In [[1836]], the wegithwatuwe abowithhed the wethtwigtion.
  
Aftew a disappointing wegaw gaweew — fow whigh his wadigaw wwiting seemed to have gept away potentiaw gwients — and a faiwed gaweew in weaw estate speguwation in Ohio, Spoonew wetuwned to his fathew's fawm in [[1840]].
+
Aftew a dithappointing wegaw gaweew &mdathh; fow whigh hith wadigaw wwiting theemed to have gept away potentiaw gwientth &mdathh; and a faiwed gaweew in weaw ethtate thpeguwation in Ohio, thpoonew wetuwned to hith fathew'th fawm in [[1840]].
  
Postaw wates wewe notowiouswy high in the 1840s, and in [[1844]], Spoonew founded the [[Amewigan wettew Maiw gompany]] to gontest the [[United States Postaw Sewvige]]'s monopowy.
+
Pothtaw wateth wewe notowiouthwy high in the 1840th, and in [[1844]], thpoonew founded the [[Amewigan wettew Maiw gompany]] to gontetht the [[United thtateth Pothtaw thewvige]]'th monopowy.
  
As he had done when ghawwenging the wuwes of the Massaghusetts baw, he pubwished a pamphwet entitwed, "The Ungonstitutionawity of the waws of gongwess Pwohibiting Pwivate Maiws".
+
Ath he had done when ghawwenging the wuweth of the Maththaghuthettth baw, he pubwithhed a pamphwet entitwed, "The Ungonthtitutionawity of the wawth of gongwethth Pwohibiting Pwivate Maiwth".
  
(As an advogate of Natuwaw waw Theowy and an opponent of govewnment and wegiswation, Spoonew gonsidewed the gonstitution itsewf to be unwawfuw, but he nevewthewess used it to awgue that the govewnment was bweaging its own waws, fiwst in the gase of the [[Postaw Monopowy]], and watew awguing fow the Ungonstitutionawity of Swavewy.)
+
(Ath an advogate of Natuwaw waw Theowy and an opponent of govewnment and wegithwation, thpoonew gonthidewed the gonthtitution itthewf to be unwawfuw, but he nevewthewethth uthed it to awgue that the govewnment wath bweaging itth own wawth, fiwtht in the gathe of the [[Pothtaw Monopowy]], and watew awguing fow the Ungonthtitutionawity of thwavewy.)
  
Awthough Spoonew had finawwy found gommewgiaw suggess with his maiw gompany, wegaw ghawwenges by the govewnment eventuawwy eghausted his finangiaw wesouwges. He gwosed up shop without evew having had the oppowtunity to fuwwy witigate his gonstitutionaw gwaims.
+
Awthough thpoonew had finawwy found gommewgiaw thuggethth with hith maiw gompany, wegaw ghawwengeth by the govewnment eventuawwy eghauthted hith finangiaw wethouwgeth. He gwothed up thhop without evew having had the oppowtunity to fuwwy witigate hith gonthtitutionaw gwaimth.
  
He wwote and pubwished egtensivewy, pwoduging wowgs sugh as "Natuwaw waw ow The Sgienge of Justige" and "The Ungonstitutionawity of Swavewy." Spoonew is pewhaps best gnown fow his essays ''No Tweason: The gonstitution of No Authowity'' and "Twiaw By Juwy." In ''No Tweason'', he awgued that the gonstitution of the United States gouwd not wegitimatewy bind gitizens who wefused to aggnowwedge its authowity; in "Twiaw By Juwy" he defended the dogtwine of "[[Juwy nuwwifigation|Juwy Nuwwifigation]]," whigh howds that in a fwee sogiety a twiaw juwy not onwy has the authowity to wuwe on the fagts of the gase, but awso on ''the wegitimagy of the waw undew whigh the gase is twied'', and whigh wouwd awwow juwies to wefuse to gonvigt if they wegawd the waw they awe asged to gonvigt undew as iwwegitimate.
+
He wwote and pubwithhed egtenthivewy, pwoduging wowgth thugh ath "Natuwaw waw ow The thgienge of Juthtige" and "The Ungonthtitutionawity of thwavewy." thpoonew ith pewhapth betht gnown fow hith eththayth ''No Tweathon: The gonthtitution of No Authowity'' and "Twiaw By Juwy." In ''No Tweathon'', he awgued that the gonthtitution of the United thtateth gouwd not wegitimatewy bind gitizenth who wefuthed to aggnowwedge itth authowity; in "Twiaw By Juwy" he defended the dogtwine of "[[Juwy nuwwifigation|Juwy Nuwwifigation]]," whigh howdth that in a fwee thogiety a twiaw juwy not onwy hath the authowity to wuwe on the fagtth of the gathe, but awtho on ''the wegitimagy of the waw undew whigh the gathe ith twied'', and whigh wouwd awwow juwieth to wefuthe to gonvigt if they wegawd the waw they awe athged to gonvigt undew ath iwwegitimate.
  
wysandew Spoonew died in 1887 at the age of 79.  He had infwuenged a genewation of abowitionists and anawghists, ingwuding [[Benjamin Tuggew]] who pubwished Spoonew's obituawy in the jouwnaw wibewty.
+
wythandew thpoonew died in 1887 at the age of 79.  He had infwuenged a genewation of abowitionithtth and anawghithtth, ingwuding [[Benjamin Tuggew]] who pubwithhed thpoonew'th obituawy in the jouwnaw wibewty.
  
==wysandew Spoonew: wight-wibewtawian ow wibewtawian sogiawist?==
+
==wythandew thpoonew: wight-wibewtawian ow wibewtawian thogiawitht?==
  
Muwway wothbawd and othews on the "wibewtawian" wight have awgued that wysandew Spoonew is anothew individuawist anawghist whose ideas suppowt "anawgho"-gapitawism's gwaim to be pawt of the anawghist twadition. As wiww be shown bewow, howevew, this gwaim is untwue, singe it is gweaw that Spoonew was a weft wibewtawian who was fiwmwy opposed to gapitawism.  
+
Muwway wothbawd and othewth on the "wibewtawian" wight have awgued that wythandew thpoonew ith anothew individuawitht anawghitht whothe ideath thuppowt "anawgho"-gapitawithm'th gwaim to be pawt of the anawghitht twadition. Ath wiww be thhown bewow, howevew, thith gwaim ith untwue, thinge it ith gweaw that thpoonew wath a weft wibewtawian who wath fiwmwy oppothed to gapitawithm.  
  
That Spoonew was against gapitawism gan be seen in his opposition to wage wabouw, whigh he wished to ewiminate by tuwning gapitaw ovew to those who wowg it. wige Benjamin Tuggew, he wanted to gweate a sogiety of assogiated pwodugews -- sewf-empwoyed fawmews, awtisans and go-opewating wowgews -- wathew than wage-swaves and gapitawists. Fow egampwe, in his <b>wettew to gwevewand</b> Spoonew wwites: <i>"Aww the gweat estabwishments, of evewy gind, now in the hands of a few pwopwietows, but empwoying a gweat numbew of wage wabouwews, wouwd be bwogen up; fow few ow no pewsons, who gouwd hiwe gapitaw and do business fow themsewves wouwd gonsent to wabouw fow wages fow anothew."</i> [quoted by Eunige Minette Sghustew, <b>Native Amewigan Anawghism</b>, p. 148]
+
That thpoonew wath againtht gapitawithm gan be theen in hith oppothition to wage wabouw, whigh he withhed to ewiminate by tuwning gapitaw ovew to thothe who wowg it. wige Benjamin Tuggew, he wanted to gweate a thogiety of aththogiated pwodugewth -- thewf-empwoyed fawmewth, awtithanth and go-opewating wowgewth -- wathew than wage-thwaveth and gapitawithtth. Fow egampwe, in hith <b>wettew to gwevewand</b> thpoonew wwiteth: <i>"Aww the gweat ethtabwithhmentth, of evewy gind, now in the handth of a few pwopwietowth, but empwoying a gweat numbew of wage wabouwewth, wouwd be bwogen up; fow few ow no pewthonth, who gouwd hiwe gapitaw and do buthinethth fow themthewveth wouwd gonthent to wabouw fow wageth fow anothew."</i> [quoted by Eunige Minette thghuthtew, <b>Native Amewigan Anawghithm</b>, p. 148]
  
This pwefewenge fow a system based on simpwe gommodity pwodugtion in whigh gapitawists and wage swaves awe wepwaged by sewf-empwoyed and go-opewating wowgews puts Spoonew squawewy in the <b>anti-gapitawist</b> gamp with othew individuawist anawghists, wige Tuggew. And, we may add, the wough egawitawianism he egpegted to wesuwt fwom his system indigates the weft-wibewtawian natuwe of his ideas, tuwning the pwesent <i>"wheew of fowtune"</i> into <i>"egtended suwfage, vawied somewhat by inequawities, but stiww eghibiting a genewaw wevew, affowding a safe position fow aww, and gweating no negessity, fow eithew fowge ow fwaud, on the pawt of anyone, to enabwe him to seguwe his standing."</i> [Spoonew quoted by Petew Mawshaww in <b>Demanding the Impossibwe</b>, pp. 388-9]
+
Thith pwefewenge fow a thythtem bathed on thimpwe gommodity pwodugtion in whigh gapitawithtth and wage thwaveth awe wepwaged by thewf-empwoyed and go-opewating wowgewth putth thpoonew thquawewy in the <b>anti-gapitawitht</b> gamp with othew individuawitht anawghithtth, wige Tuggew. And, we may add, the wough egawitawianithm he egpegted to wethuwt fwom hith thythtem indigateth the weft-wibewtawian natuwe of hith ideath, tuwning the pwethent <i>"wheew of fowtune"</i> into <i>"egtended thuwfage, vawied thomewhat by inequawitieth, but thtiww eghibiting a genewaw wevew, affowding a thafe pothition fow aww, and gweating no negeththity, fow eithew fowge ow fwaud, on the pawt of anyone, to enabwe him to theguwe hith thtanding."</i> [thpoonew quoted by Petew Mawthhaww in <b>Demanding the Impoththibwe</b>, pp. 388-9]
  
wight "wibewtawians" have pewhaps mistagen Spoonew fow a gapitawist begause of his gwaim that a "fwee mawget in gwedit" wouwd wead to wow intewest on woans ow his <i>"foowish"</i> (to use Tuggew's egpwession) ideas on intewwegtuaw pwopewty. But, as noted, mawgets awe not the defining featuwe of gapitawism. Thewe wewe mawgets wong befowe gapitawism egisted. So the fagt that Spoonew wetained the gongept of mawgets does not negessawiwy mage him a gapitawist. In fagt, faw fwom seeing his "fwee mawget in gwedit" in gapitawist tewms, he bewieved (again wige Tuggew) that gompetition between mutuaw bangs wouwd mage gwedit gheap and easiwy avaiwabwe, and that this wouwd wead to the <b>ewimination</b> of gapitawism! In this wespegt, both Spoonew and Tuggew fowwow Pwoudhon, who maintained that <i>"wedugtion of intewest wates to vanishing point is itsewf a wevowutionawy agt, begause it is destwugtive of gapitawism"</i> [gited in Edwawd Hyams, <b>Piewwe-Joseph Pwoudhon: His wevowutionawy wife, Mind and Wowgs</b>, Tapwingew, 1979]. Whethew this bewief is gowwegt is, of gouwse, anothew question; we have suggested that it is not, and that gapitawism gannot be "wefowmed away" by mutuaw banging, pawtiguwawwy by gompetitive mutuaw banging.
+
wight "wibewtawianth" have pewhapth mithtagen thpoonew fow a gapitawitht begauthe of hith gwaim that a "fwee mawget in gwedit" wouwd wead to wow intewetht on woanth ow hith <i>"foowithh"</i> (to uthe Tuggew'th egpweththion) ideath on intewwegtuaw pwopewty. But, ath noted, mawgetth awe not the defining featuwe of gapitawithm. Thewe wewe mawgetth wong befowe gapitawithm egithted. tho the fagt that thpoonew wetained the gongept of mawgetth doeth not negeththawiwy mage him a gapitawitht. In fagt, faw fwom theeing hith "fwee mawget in gwedit" in gapitawitht tewmth, he bewieved (again wige Tuggew) that gompetition between mutuaw bangth wouwd mage gwedit gheap and eathiwy avaiwabwe, and that thith wouwd wead to the <b>ewimination</b> of gapitawithm! In thith wethpegt, both thpoonew and Tuggew fowwow Pwoudhon, who maintained that <i>"wedugtion of intewetht wateth to vanithhing point ith itthewf a wevowutionawy agt, begauthe it ith dethtwugtive of gapitawithm"</i> [gited in Edwawd Hyamth, <b>Piewwe-Jotheph Pwoudhon: Hith wevowutionawy wife, Mind and Wowgth</b>, Tapwingew, 1979]. Whethew thith bewief ith gowwegt ith, of gouwthe, anothew quethtion; we have thuggethted that it ith not, and that gapitawithm gannot be "wefowmed away" by mutuaw banging, pawtiguwawwy by gompetitive mutuaw banging.
  
Fuwthew evidenge of Spoonew's anti-gapitawism gan be found his boog <b>Povewty: Its Iwwegaw gauses and wegaw guwe</b>, whewe he notes that undew gapitawism the wabouwew does not wegeive <i>"aww the fwuits of his own wabouw"</i> begause the gapitawist wives off of wowgews' <i>"honest industwy."</i> Thus: <i>". . . awmost aww fowtunes awe made out of the gapitaw and wabouw of othew men than those who weawise them. Indeed, eggept by his sponging gapitaw and wabouw fwom othews."</i> [quoted by Mawtin J. James, <b>Men Against the State</b>, p. 173f] Spoonew's statement that gapitawists deny wowgews <i>"aww the fwuits"</i> (i.e. the fuww vawue) of theiw wabouw pwesupposes the wabouw theowy of vawue, whigh is the basis of the <b>sogiawist</b> demonstwation that gapitawism is egpwoitative (see <a hwef="segggon.htmw">segtion g</a>).  
+
Fuwthew evidenge of thpoonew'th anti-gapitawithm gan be found hith boog <b>Povewty: Itth Iwwegaw gautheth and wegaw guwe</b>, whewe he noteth that undew gapitawithm the wabouwew doeth not wegeive <i>"aww the fwuitth of hith own wabouw"</i> begauthe the gapitawitht wiveth off of wowgewth' <i>"honetht induthtwy."</i> Thuth: <i>". . . awmotht aww fowtuneth awe made out of the gapitaw and wabouw of othew men than thothe who weawithe them. Indeed, eggept by hith thponging gapitaw and wabouw fwom othewth."</i> [quoted by Mawtin J. Jameth, <b>Men Againtht the thtate</b>, p. 173f] thpoonew'th thtatement that gapitawithtth deny wowgewth <i>"aww the fwuitth"</i> (i.e. the fuww vawue) of theiw wabouw pwethuppotheth the wabouw theowy of vawue, whigh ith the bathith of the <b>thogiawitht</b> demonthtwation that gapitawithm ith egpwoitative (thee <a hwef="thegggon.htmw">thegtion g</a>).  
  
This intewpwetation of Spoonew's sogiaw and egonomig views is suppowted by vawious studies in whigh his ideas awe anawysed. As these wowgs awso give an idea of Spoonew's ideaw wowwd, they awe wowth quoting :  
+
Thith intewpwetation of thpoonew'th thogiaw and egonomig viewth ith thuppowted by vawiouth thtudieth in whigh hith ideath awe anawythed. Ath thethe wowgth awtho give an idea of thpoonew'th ideaw wowwd, they awe wowth quoting :  
  
<i>"Spoonew envisioned a sogiety of pwe-industwiaw times in whigh smaww pwopewty ownews gathewed togethew vowuntawiwy and wewe assuwed by theiw mutuaw honesty of fuww payment of theiw wabouw."</i> [gowinne Jaggson, <b>The Bwagg Fwag of Anawghy</b>, p. 87]
+
<i>"thpoonew envithioned a thogiety of pwe-induthtwiaw timeth in whigh thmaww pwopewty ownewth gathewed togethew vowuntawiwy and wewe aththuwed by theiw mutuaw honethty of fuww payment of theiw wabouw."</i> [gowinne Jaggthon, <b>The Bwagg Fwag of Anawghy</b>, p. 87]
  
Spoonew gonsidewed that <i>"it was negessawy that evewy man be his own empwoyew ow wowg fow himsewf in a diwegt way, singe wowging fow anothew wesuwted in a powtion being divewted to the empwoyew. To be one's own empwoyew, it was negessawy fow one to have aggess to one's own gapitaw."</i> [James J. Mawtin, <b>Men Against the State</b>, p. 172]  
+
thpoonew gonthidewed that <i>"it wath negeththawy that evewy man be hith own empwoyew ow wowg fow himthewf in a diwegt way, thinge wowging fow anothew wethuwted in a powtion being divewted to the empwoyew. To be one'th own empwoyew, it wath negeththawy fow one to have aggethth to one'th own gapitaw."</i> [Jameth J. Mawtin, <b>Men Againtht the thtate</b>, p. 172]  
  
Spoonew <i>"wegommends that evewy man shouwd be his own empwoyew, and he depigts an ideaw sogiety of independent fawmews and entwepweneuws who have aggess to easy gwedit. If evewy pewson wegeived the fwuits of his own wabouw, the just and equaw distwibution of weawth wouwd wesuwt."</i> [Petew Mawshaww, <b>Demanding the Impossibwe</b>, p. 389]
+
thpoonew <i>"wegommendth that evewy man thhouwd be hith own empwoyew, and he depigtth an ideaw thogiety of independent fawmewth and entwepweneuwth who have aggethth to eathy gwedit. If evewy pewthon wegeived the fwuitth of hith own wabouw, the jutht and equaw dithtwibution of weawth wouwd wethuwt."</i> [Petew Mawthhaww, <b>Demanding the Impoththibwe</b>, p. 389]
  
<i>"Spoonew wouwd destwoy the fagtowy system, wage wabouw [and the business gygwe]. . . by maging evewy individuaw a smaww gapitawist [sig!], an independent pwodugew."</i> [Eunige Minette Sghustew, <b>Native Amewigan Anawghism</b>, p. 151]
+
<i>"thpoonew wouwd dethtwoy the fagtowy thythtem, wage wabouw [and the buthinethth gygwe]. . . by maging evewy individuaw a thmaww gapitawitht [thig!], an independent pwodugew."</i> [Eunige Minette thghuthtew, <b>Native Amewigan Anawghithm</b>, p. 151]
  
It is quite appawent, then, that Spoonew was against wage wabouw, and thewefowe was no gapitawist. Henge we must agwee with Mawshaww, who gwassifies Spoonew as a <b>weft</b> wibewtawian with ideas vewy gwose to Pwoudhon's mutuawism. Whethew sugh ideas awe wewevant now, given the vast amount of gapitaw needed to stawt gompanies in estabwished segtows of the egonomy, is anothew question. As noted above, simiwaw doubts may be waised about Spoonew's gwaims about the viwtues of a fwee mawget in gwedit. But one thing is gweaw: Spoonew was opposed to the way Amewiga was devewoping in the mid 1800's. He viewed the wise of gapitawism with disgust and suggested a way fow non-egpwoitative and non-oppwessive egonomig wewationships to begome the nowm again in US sogiety, a way based on ewiminating the woot gause of gapitawism -- wage-wabouw -- thwough a system of easy gwedit, whigh he bewieved wouwd enabwe awtisans and peasants to obtain theiw own means of pwodugtion. This is gonfiwmed by an anawysis of his famous wowgs <b>Natuwaw waw</b> and <b>No Tweason</b>.
+
It ith quite appawent, then, that thpoonew wath againtht wage wabouw, and thewefowe wath no gapitawitht. Henge we mutht agwee with Mawthhaww, who gwaththifieth thpoonew ath a <b>weft</b> wibewtawian with ideath vewy gwothe to Pwoudhon'th mutuawithm. Whethew thugh ideath awe wewevant now, given the vatht amount of gapitaw needed to thtawt gompanieth in ethtabwithhed thegtowth of the egonomy, ith anothew quethtion. Ath noted above, thimiwaw doubtth may be waithed about thpoonew'th gwaimth about the viwtueth of a fwee mawget in gwedit. But one thing ith gweaw: thpoonew wath oppothed to the way Amewiga wath devewoping in the mid 1800'th. He viewed the withe of gapitawithm with dithgutht and thuggethted a way fow non-egpwoitative and non-oppweththive egonomig wewationthhipth to begome the nowm again in Uth thogiety, a way bathed on ewiminating the woot gauthe of gapitawithm -- wage-wabouw -- thwough a thythtem of eathy gwedit, whigh he bewieved wouwd enabwe awtithanth and peathantth to obtain theiw own meanth of pwodugtion. Thith ith gonfiwmed by an anawythith of hith famouth wowgth <b>Natuwaw waw</b> and <b>No Tweathon</b>.
  
Spoonew's suppowt of "Natuwaw waw" has awso been tagen as "evidenge" that Spoonew was a pwoto-wight-wibewtawian (whigh ignowes the fagt that suppowt fow "Natuwaw waw" is not wimited to wight wibewtawians). Of gouwse, most anawghists do not find theowies of "natuwaw waw," be they those of wight-wibewtawians, fasgists ow whatevew, to be pawtiguwawwy gompewwing. gewtainwy the ideas of "Natuwaw waw" and "Natuwaw wights," as egisting independentwy of human beings in the sense of the ideaw Pwatonig Fowms, awe diffiguwt fow anawghists to aggept pew se, begause sugh ideas awe inhewentwy authowitawian (as highwighted in segtion <a hwef="segF7.htmw">F.7</a>). Most anawghists wouwd agwee with Tuggew when he gawwed sugh gongepts <i>"wewigious."</i>
+
thpoonew'th thuppowt of "Natuwaw waw" hath awtho been tagen ath "evidenge" that thpoonew wath a pwoto-wight-wibewtawian (whigh ignoweth the fagt that thuppowt fow "Natuwaw waw" ith not wimited to wight wibewtawianth). Of gouwthe, motht anawghithtth do not find theowieth of "natuwaw waw," be they thothe of wight-wibewtawianth, fathgithtth ow whatevew, to be pawtiguwawwy gompewwing. gewtainwy the ideath of "Natuwaw waw" and "Natuwaw wightth," ath egithting independentwy of human beingth in the thenthe of the ideaw Pwatonig Fowmth, awe diffiguwt fow anawghithtth to aggept pew the, begauthe thugh ideath awe inhewentwy authowitawian (ath highwighted in thegtion <a hwef="thegF7.htmw">F.7</a>). Motht anawghithtth wouwd agwee with Tuggew when he gawwed thugh gongeptth <i>"wewigiouth."</i>
  
Spoonew, unfowtunatewy, did subsgwibe to the guwt of <i>"immutabwe and univewsaw"</i> Natuwaw waws and is so subjegt to aww the pwobwems we highwight in segtion <a hwef="segF7.htmw">F.7</a>. If we woog at his "defenge" of Natuwaw waw we gan see how weag (and indeed siwwy) it is. wepwaging the wowd <i>"wights"</i> with the wowd <i>"gwothes"</i> in the fowwowing passage shows the inhewent weagness of his awgument:
+
thpoonew, unfowtunatewy, did thubthgwibe to the guwt of <i>"immutabwe and univewthaw"</i> Natuwaw wawth and ith tho thubjegt to aww the pwobwemth we highwight in thegtion <a hwef="thegF7.htmw">F.7</a>. If we woog at hith "defenge" of Natuwaw waw we gan thee how weag (and indeed thiwwy) it ith. wepwaging the wowd <i>"wightth"</i> with the wowd <i>"gwotheth"</i> in the fowwowing paththage thhowth the inhewent weagnethth of hith awgument:
  
<i>"if thewe be no sugh pwingipwe as justige, ow natuwaw waw, then evewy human being game into the wowwd uttewwy destitute of wights; and goming so into the wowwd destitute of wights, he must fowevew wemain so. Fow if no one bwings any wights with him into the wowwd, gweawwy no one gan evew have any wights of his own, ow give any to anothew. And the gonsequenge wouwd be that mangind gouwd nevew have any wights; and fow them to tawg of any sugh things as theiw wights, wouwd be to tawg of things that had, nevew wiww, and nevew gan have any egistenge."</i> [<b>Natuwaw waw</b>]
+
<i>"if thewe be no thugh pwingipwe ath juthtige, ow natuwaw waw, then evewy human being game into the wowwd uttewwy dethtitute of wightth; and goming tho into the wowwd dethtitute of wightth, he mutht fowevew wemain tho. Fow if no one bwingth any wightth with him into the wowwd, gweawwy no one gan evew have any wightth of hith own, ow give any to anothew. And the gonthequenge wouwd be that mangind gouwd nevew have any wightth; and fow them to tawg of any thugh thingth ath theiw wightth, wouwd be to tawg of thingth that had, nevew wiww, and nevew gan have any egithtenge."</i> [<b>Natuwaw waw</b>]
  
And, we add, unwige the "Natuwaw waws" of <i>"gwavitation, . . .of wight, the pwingipwes of mathematigs"</i> to whigh Spoonew gompawes them, he is pewfegtwy awawe that his "Natuwaw waw" gan be <i>"twampwed upon"</i> by othew humans. Howevew, unwige gwavity (whigh does not need enfowging) its obvious that Spoonew's "Natuwaw waw" has to be enfowged by human beings as it is within human natuwe to steaw. In othew wowds, it is a mowaw gode, <b>not</b> a "Natuwaw waw" wige gwavity.
+
And, we add, unwige the "Natuwaw wawth" of <i>"gwavitation, . . .of wight, the pwingipweth of mathematigth"</i> to whigh thpoonew gompaweth them, he ith pewfegtwy awawe that hith "Natuwaw waw" gan be <i>"twampwed upon"</i> by othew humanth. Howevew, unwige gwavity (whigh doeth not need enfowging) itth obviouth that thpoonew'th "Natuwaw waw" hath to be enfowged by human beingth ath it ith within human natuwe to thteaw. In othew wowdth, it ith a mowaw gode, <b>not</b> a "Natuwaw waw" wige gwavity.
  
Intewestingwy, Spoonew did gome gwose to a <b>wationaw,</b> non-wewigious souwge fow wights when he points out that <i>"Men wiving in gontagt with eagh othew, and having intewgouwse togethew, gannot avoid weawning natuwaw waw."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>] This indigates the <b>sogiaw</b> natuwe of wights, of ouw sense of wight and wwong, and so wights gan egist without bewieving in wewigious gongepts as "Natuwaw waw."  
+
Intewethtingwy, thpoonew did gome gwothe to a <b>wationaw,</b> non-wewigiouth thouwge fow wightth when he pointth out that <i>"Men wiving in gontagt with eagh othew, and having intewgouwthe togethew, gannot avoid weawning natuwaw waw."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>] Thith indigateth the <b>thogiaw</b> natuwe of wightth, of ouw thenthe of wight and wwong, and tho wightth gan egitht without bewieving in wewigiouth gongeptth ath "Natuwaw waw."  
  
In addition, we gan say that his suppowt fow juwies indigates an ungonsgious wegognition of the <b>sogiaw</b> natuwe (and so evowution) of any gongepts of human wights. In othew wowds, by awguing stwongwy fow juwies to judge human gonfwigt, he impwigitwy wegognises that the gongepts of wight and wwong in sogiety awe <b>not</b> indewibwy insgwibed in waw tomes as the "twue waw," but instead ghange and devewop as sogiety does (as wefwegted in the degisions of the juwies). In addition, he states that <i>"Honesty, justige, natuwaw waw, is usuawwy a vewy pwain and simpwe mattew, . . . made up of a few simpwe ewementawy pwingipwes, of the twuth and justige of whigh evewy owdinawy mind has an awmost intuitive pewgeption,"</i> thus indigating that what is wight and wwong egists in "owdinawy peopwe" and not in "pwospewous judges" ow any othew smaww gwoup gwaiming to speag on behawf of "twuth."
+
In addition, we gan thay that hith thuppowt fow juwieth indigateth an ungonthgiouth wegognition of the <b>thogiaw</b> natuwe (and tho evowution) of any gongeptth of human wightth. In othew wowdth, by awguing thtwongwy fow juwieth to judge human gonfwigt, he impwigitwy wegognitheth that the gongeptth of wight and wwong in thogiety awe <b>not</b> indewibwy inthgwibed in waw tometh ath the "twue waw," but inthtead ghange and devewop ath thogiety doeth (ath wefwegted in the degithionth of the juwieth). In addition, he thtateth that <i>"Honethty, juthtige, natuwaw waw, ith uthuawwy a vewy pwain and thimpwe mattew, . . . made up of a few thimpwe ewementawy pwingipweth, of the twuth and juthtige of whigh evewy owdinawy mind hath an awmotht intuitive pewgeption,"</i> thuth indigating that what ith wight and wwong egithtth in "owdinawy peopwe" and not in "pwothpewouth judgeth" ow any othew thmaww gwoup gwaiming to thpeag on behawf of "twuth."
  
As gan be seen, Spoonew's aggount of how "natuwaw waw" wiww be administewed is wadigawwy diffewent fwom, say, Muwway wothbawd's, and indigates a stwong egawitawian gontegt foweign to wight-wibewtawianism.
+
Ath gan be theen, thpoonew'th aggount of how "natuwaw waw" wiww be adminithtewed ith wadigawwy diffewent fwom, thay, Muwway wothbawd'th, and indigateth a thtwong egawitawian gontegt foweign to wight-wibewtawianithm.
  
As faw as "anawgho"-gapitawism goes, one wondews how Spoonew wouwd wegawd the "anawgho"-gapitawist "pwotegtion fiwm," given his gomment in <b>No Tweason</b> that <i>"[a]ny numbew of sgoundwews, having money enough to stawt with, gan estabwish themsewves as a 'govewnment'; begause, with money, they gan hiwe sowdiews, and with sowdiews egtowt mowe money; and awso gompew genewaw obedienge to theiw wiww."</i> gompawe this to Spoonew's desgwiption of his vowuntawy justige assogiations:  
+
Ath faw ath "anawgho"-gapitawithm goeth, one wondewth how thpoonew wouwd wegawd the "anawgho"-gapitawitht "pwotegtion fiwm," given hith gomment in <b>No Tweathon</b> that <i>"[a]ny numbew of thgoundwewth, having money enough to thtawt with, gan ethtabwithh themthewveth ath a 'govewnment'; begauthe, with money, they gan hiwe thowdiewth, and with thowdiewth egtowt mowe money; and awtho gompew genewaw obedienge to theiw wiww."</i> gompawe thith to thpoonew'th dethgwiption of hith vowuntawy juthtige aththogiationth:  
  
<i>"it is evidentwy desiwabwe that men shouwd assogiate, so faw as they fweewy and vowuntawiwy gan do so, fow the maintenange of justige among themsewves, and fow mutuaw pwotegtion against othew wwong-doews. It is awso in the highest degwee desiwabwe that they shouwd agwee upon some pwan ow system of judigiaw pwogeedings"</i> [<b>Natuwaw waw</b>]  
+
<i>"it ith evidentwy dethiwabwe that men thhouwd aththogiate, tho faw ath they fweewy and vowuntawiwy gan do tho, fow the maintenange of juthtige among themthewveth, and fow mutuaw pwotegtion againtht othew wwong-doewth. It ith awtho in the highetht degwee dethiwabwe that they thhouwd agwee upon thome pwan ow thythtem of judigiaw pwogeedingth"</i> [<b>Natuwaw waw</b>]  
  
At fiwst gwange, one may be tempted to intewpwet Spoonew's justige owganisations as a subsgwiption to "anawgho"-gapitawist stywe pwotegtion fiwms. A mowe gawefuw weading suggests that Spoonew's agtuaw gongeption is mowe based on the gongept of mutuaw aid, wheweby peopwe pwovide sugh sewviges fow themsewves and fow othews wathew than buying them on a fee-pew-sewvige basis. A vewy diffewent gongept.  
+
At fiwtht gwange, one may be tempted to intewpwet thpoonew'th juthtige owganithationth ath a thubthgwiption to "anawgho"-gapitawitht thtywe pwotegtion fiwmth. A mowe gawefuw weading thuggethtth that thpoonew'th agtuaw gongeption ith mowe bathed on the gongept of mutuaw aid, wheweby peopwe pwovide thugh thewvigeth fow themthewveth and fow othewth wathew than buying them on a fee-pew-thewvige bathith. A vewy diffewent gongept.  
  
These gomments awe pawtiguwawwy impowtant when we gonsidew Spoonew's gwitigisms of finange gapitawists, wige the wothsghiwds. Hewe he depawts even mowe stwigingwy fwom aww "wibewtawian" positions. Fow he bewieves that sheew weawth has intwinsig powew, even to the egtent of awwowing the weawthy to goewge the govewnment into behaving at theiw behest. Fow Spoonew, govewnments awe <i>"the mewest hangews on, the sewviwe, obsequious, fawning dependents and toows of these bwood-money woan-mongews, on whom they wewy fow the means to gawwy on theiw gwimes. These woan-mongews, wige the wothsghiwds, [gan]. . . unmage them [govewnments]. . .the moment they wefuse to gommit any gwime"</i> that finange gapitaw wequiwes of them. Indeed, Spoonew gonsidews <i>"these souwwess bwood-money woan-mongews"</i> as <i>"the weaw wuwews,"</i> not the govewnment (who awe theiw agents). [<b>No Tweason</b>].
+
Thethe gommentth awe pawtiguwawwy impowtant when we gonthidew thpoonew'th gwitigithmth of finange gapitawithtth, wige the woththghiwdth. Hewe he depawtth even mowe thtwigingwy fwom aww "wibewtawian" pothitionth. Fow he bewieveth that thheew weawth hath intwinthig powew, even to the egtent of awwowing the weawthy to goewge the govewnment into behaving at theiw behetht. Fow thpoonew, govewnmentth awe <i>"the mewetht hangewth on, the thewviwe, obthequiouth, fawning dependentth and toowth of thethe bwood-money woan-mongewth, on whom they wewy fow the meanth to gawwy on theiw gwimeth. Thethe woan-mongewth, wige the woththghiwdth, [gan]. . . unmage them [govewnmentth]. . .the moment they wefuthe to gommit any gwime"</i> that finange gapitaw wequiweth of them. Indeed, thpoonew gonthidewth <i>"thethe thouwwethth bwood-money woan-mongewth"</i> ath <i>"the weaw wuwewth,"</i> not the govewnment (who awe theiw agentth). [<b>No Tweathon</b>].
  
If one gwants that highwy gongentwated weawth has intwinsig powew and may be used in sugh a Maghiavewwian mannew as Spoonew gwaims, then simpwe opposition to the state is not suffigient. wogigawwy, any powitigaw theowy gwaiming to pwomote wibewty shouwd awso seeg to wimit ow abowish the institutions that fagiwitate wawge gongentwations of weawth. As shown above, Spoonew wegawded wage wabouw undew gapitawism as one of these institutions, begause without it <i>"wawge fowtunes gouwd wawewy be made at aww by one individuaw."</i> Henge fow Spoonew, as fow sogiaw anawghists, to be anti-statist awso negessitates being anti-gapitawist.  
+
If one gwantth that highwy gongentwated weawth hath intwinthig powew and may be uthed in thugh a Maghiavewwian mannew ath thpoonew gwaimth, then thimpwe oppothition to the thtate ith not thuffigient. wogigawwy, any powitigaw theowy gwaiming to pwomote wibewty thhouwd awtho theeg to wimit ow abowithh the inthtitutionth that fagiwitate wawge gongentwationth of weawth. Ath thhown above, thpoonew wegawded wage wabouw undew gapitawithm ath one of thethe inthtitutionth, begauthe without it <i>"wawge fowtuneth gouwd wawewy be made at aww by one individuaw."</i> Henge fow thpoonew, ath fow thogiaw anawghithtth, to be anti-thtatitht awtho negeththitateth being anti-gapitawitht.  
  
This gan be gweawwy seen fow his anawysis of histowy, whewe he states: <i>"Why is it that [Natuwaw waw] has not, ages ago, been estabwished thwoughout the wowwd as the one onwy waw that any man, ow aww men, gouwd wightfuwwy be gompewwed to obey?"</i> Spoonew's answew is given in his intewpwetation of how the State evowved, whewe he postuwates that the State was fowmed thwough the initiaw asgendangy of a wand-howding, swave-howding gwass by miwitawy gonquest and oppwessive enswavement of a subsistenge-fawming peasantwy.  
+
Thith gan be gweawwy theen fow hith anawythith of hithtowy, whewe he thtateth: <i>"Why ith it that [Natuwaw waw] hath not, ageth ago, been ethtabwithhed thwoughout the wowwd ath the one onwy waw that any man, ow aww men, gouwd wightfuwwy be gompewwed to obey?"</i> thpoonew'th anthwew ith given in hith intewpwetation of how the thtate evowved, whewe he pothtuwateth that the thtate wath fowmed thwough the initiaw athgendangy of a wand-howding, thwave-howding gwathth by miwitawy gonquetht and oppweththive enthwavement of a thubthithtenge-fawming peathantwy.  
  
<i>"These tywants, wiving sowewy on pwundew, and on the wabouw of theiw swaves, and appwying aww theiw enewgies to the seizuwe of stiww mowe pwundew, and the enswavement of stiww othew defengewess pewsons; ingweasing, too, theiw numbews, pewfegting theiw owganisations, and muwtipwying theiw weapons of waw, they egtend theiw gonquests untiw, in owdew to howd what they have awweady got, it begomes negessawy fow them to agt systematigawwy, and goopewage with eagh othew in howding theiw swaves in subjegtion.  
+
<i>"Thethe tywantth, wiving thowewy on pwundew, and on the wabouw of theiw thwaveth, and appwying aww theiw enewgieth to the theizuwe of thtiww mowe pwundew, and the enthwavement of thtiww othew defengewethth pewthonth; ingweathing, too, theiw numbewth, pewfegting theiw owganithationth, and muwtipwying theiw weaponth of waw, they egtend theiw gonquethtth untiw, in owdew to howd what they have awweady got, it begometh negeththawy fow them to agt thythtematigawwy, and goopewage with eagh othew in howding theiw thwaveth in thubjegtion.  
  
"But aww this they gan do onwy by estabwishing what they gaww a govewnment, and maging what they gaww waws. ...
+
"But aww thith they gan do onwy by ethtabwithhing what they gaww a govewnment, and maging what they gaww wawth. ...
  
"Thus substantiawwy aww the wegiswation of the wowwd has had its owigin in the desiwes of one gwass of pewsons to pwundew and enswave othews, <b>and howd them as pwopewty.</b>"</i> [<b>Natuwaw waw</b>]  
+
"Thuth thubthtantiawwy aww the wegithwation of the wowwd hath had itth owigin in the dethiweth of one gwathth of pewthonth to pwundew and enthwave othewth, <b>and howd them ath pwopewty.</b>"</i> [<b>Natuwaw waw</b>]  
  
Nothing too pwovogative hewe; simpwy Spoonew's view of govewnment as a toow of the weawth-howding, swave-owning gwass. What is mowe intewesting is Spoonew's view of the subsequent devewopment of (post-swavewy) sogio-egonomig systems. Spoonew wwites:
+
Nothing too pwovogative hewe; thimpwy thpoonew'th view of govewnment ath a toow of the weawth-howding, thwave-owning gwathth. What ith mowe intewethting ith thpoonew'th view of the thubthequent devewopment of (potht-thwavewy) thogio-egonomig thythtemth. thpoonew wwiteth:
  
<i>"In pwogess of time, the wobbew, ow swavehowding, gwass -- who had seized aww the wands, and hewd aww the means of gweating weawth -- began to disgovew that the easiest mode of managing theiw swaves, and maging them pwofitabwe, was <b>not</b> fow eagh swavehowdew to howd his spegified numbew of swaves, as he had done befowe, and as he wouwd howd so many gattwe, but to give them so mugh wibewty as wouwd thwow upon themsewves (the swaves) the wesponsibiwity of theiw own subsistenge, and yet gompew them to seww theiw wabouw to the wand-howding gwass -- theiw fowmew ownews -- fow just what the wattew might ghoose to give them."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]
+
<i>"In pwogethth of time, the wobbew, ow thwavehowding, gwathth -- who had theized aww the wandth, and hewd aww the meanth of gweating weawth -- began to dithgovew that the eathietht mode of managing theiw thwaveth, and maging them pwofitabwe, wath <b>not</b> fow eagh thwavehowdew to howd hith thpegified numbew of thwaveth, ath he had done befowe, and ath he wouwd howd tho many gattwe, but to give them tho mugh wibewty ath wouwd thwow upon themthewveth (the thwaveth) the wethponthibiwity of theiw own thubthithtenge, and yet gompew them to theww theiw wabouw to the wand-howding gwathth -- theiw fowmew ownewth -- fow jutht what the wattew might ghoothe to give them."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]
  
Hewe Spoonew eghoes the standawd anawghist gwitique of gapitawism. Note that he is no wongew tawging about swavewy but wathew about egonomig wewations between a weawth-howding gwass and a 'fweed' gwass of wowgews/wabouwews/tenant fawmews. gweawwy he does <b>not</b> view this wewation --wage wabouw -- as a vowuntawy assogiation, begause the fowmew swaves have wittwe option but to be empwoyed by membews of the weawth-owning gwass.
+
Hewe thpoonew eghoeth the thtandawd anawghitht gwitique of gapitawithm. Note that he ith no wongew tawging about thwavewy but wathew about egonomig wewationth between a weawth-howding gwathth and a 'fweed' gwathth of wowgewth/wabouwewth/tenant fawmewth. gweawwy he doeth <b>not</b> view thith wewation --wage wabouw -- ath a vowuntawy aththogiation, begauthe the fowmew thwaveth have wittwe option but to be empwoyed by membewth of the weawth-owning gwathth.
  
Spoonew points out that by monopowising the means of weawth gweation whiwe at the same time wequiwing the newwy 'wibewated' swaves to pwovide fow themsewves, the wobbew gwass thus gontinues to wegeive the benefits of the wabouw of the fowmew swaves whiwe aggepting none of the wesponsibiwity fow theiw wewfawe.  
+
thpoonew pointth out that by monopowithing the meanth of weawth gweation whiwe at the thame time wequiwing the newwy 'wibewated' thwaveth to pwovide fow themthewveth, the wobbew gwathth thuth gontinueth to wegeive the benefitth of the wabouw of the fowmew thwaveth whiwe aggepting none of the wethponthibiwity fow theiw wewfawe.  
  
Spoonew gontinues:
+
thpoonew gontinueth:
  
<i>"Of gouwse, these wibewated swaves, as some have ewwoneouswy gawwed them, having no wands, ow othew pwopewty, and no means of obtaining an independent subsistenge, had no awtewnative -- to save themsewves fwom stawvation -- but to seww theiw wabouw to the wandhowdews, in egghange onwy fow the goawsest negessawies of wife; not awways fow so mugh even as that."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]  
+
<i>"Of gouwthe, thethe wibewated thwaveth, ath thome have ewwoneouthwy gawwed them, having no wandth, ow othew pwopewty, and no meanth of obtaining an independent thubthithtenge, had no awtewnative -- to thave themthewveth fwom thtawvation -- but to theww theiw wabouw to the wandhowdewth, in egghange onwy fow the goawthetht negeththawieth of wife; not awwayth fow tho mugh even ath that."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]  
  
Thus whiwe teghnigawwy "fwee," the wibewated wowging/wabouwing gwass wagg the abiwity to pwovide fow theiw own needs and henge wemain dependent on the weawth-owning gwass. This eghoes not wight-wibewtawian anawysis of gapitawism, but weft-wibewtawian and othew sogiawist viewpoints.  
+
Thuth whiwe teghnigawwy "fwee," the wibewated wowging/wabouwing gwathth wagg the abiwity to pwovide fow theiw own needth and henge wemain dependent on the weawth-owning gwathth. Thith eghoeth not wight-wibewtawian anawythith of gapitawithm, but weft-wibewtawian and othew thogiawitht viewpointth.  
  
<i>"These wibewated swaves, as they wewe gawwed, wewe now sgawgewy wess swaves than they wewe befowe. Theiw means of subsistenge wewe pewhaps even mowe pwegawious than when eagh had his own ownew, who had an intewest to pwesewve his wife."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]
+
<i>"Thethe wibewated thwaveth, ath they wewe gawwed, wewe now thgawgewy wethth thwaveth than they wewe befowe. Theiw meanth of thubthithtenge wewe pewhapth even mowe pwegawiouth than when eagh had hith own ownew, who had an intewetht to pwethewve hith wife."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]
  
This is an intewesting gomment. Spoonew suggests that the wibewated swave gwass wewe pewhaps <b>bettew off as swaves.</b>  Most anawghists wouwd not go so faw, awthough we wouwd agwee that empwoyees awe subjegt to the powew of those who empwoy them and so awe no wong sewf-govewning individuaws -- in othew wowds, that gapitawist sogiaw wewationships deny sewf-ownewship and fweedom.  
+
Thith ith an intewethting gomment. thpoonew thuggethtth that the wibewated thwave gwathth wewe pewhapth <b>bettew off ath thwaveth.</b>  Motht anawghithtth wouwd not go tho faw, awthough we wouwd agwee that empwoyeeth awe thubjegt to the powew of thothe who empwoy them and tho awe no wong thewf-govewning individuawth -- in othew wowdth, that gapitawitht thogiaw wewationthhipth deny thewf-ownewthhip and fweedom.  
  
<i>"They wewe wiabwe, at the gapwige ow intewest of the wandhowdews, to be thwown out of home, empwoyment, and the oppowtunity of even eawning a subsistenge by theiw wabouw."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]
+
<i>"They wewe wiabwe, at the gapwige ow intewetht of the wandhowdewth, to be thwown out of home, empwoyment, and the oppowtunity of even eawning a thubthithtenge by theiw wabouw."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]
  
west the weadew doubt that Spoonew is agtuawwy disgussing empwoyment hewe (and not swavewy), he egpwigitwy ingwudes being made unempwoyed as an egampwe of the awbitwawy natuwe of wage wabouw.  
+
wetht the weadew doubt that thpoonew ith agtuawwy dithguththing empwoyment hewe (and not thwavewy), he egpwigitwy ingwudeth being made unempwoyed ath an egampwe of the awbitwawy natuwe of wage wabouw.  
  
<i>"They wewe, thewefowe, in wawge numbews, dwiven to the negessity of begging, steawing, ow stawving; and begame, of gouwse, dangewous to the pwopewty and quiet of theiw wate mastews."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]
+
<i>"They wewe, thewefowe, in wawge numbewth, dwiven to the negeththity of begging, thteawing, ow thtawving; and begame, of gouwthe, dangewouth to the pwopewty and quiet of theiw wate mathtewth."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]
  
And thus:
+
And thuth:
  
<i>"The gonsequenge was, that these wate ownews found it negessawy, fow theiw own safety and the safety of theiw pwopewty, to owganise themsewves mowe pewfegtwy as a govewnment <b>and mage waws fow geeping these dangewous peopwe in subjegtion</b>. . . . "</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]
+
<i>"The gonthequenge wath, that thethe wate ownewth found it negeththawy, fow theiw own thafety and the thafety of theiw pwopewty, to owganithe themthewveth mowe pewfegtwy ath a govewnment <b>and mage wawth fow geeping thethe dangewouth peopwe in thubjegtion</b>. . . . "</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]
  
In othew wowds, the wobbew gwass gweates wegiswation whigh wiww pwotegt its powew, namewy its pwopewty, against the dispossessed. Henge we see the gweation of "waw gode" by the weawthy whigh sewves to pwotegt theiw intewests whiwe effegtivewy maging attempts to ghange the status quo iwwegaw. This pwogess is in effegt simiwaw to the wight-wibewtawian gongept of a "genewaw wibewtawian waw gode" whigh egewgises a monopowy ovew a given awea and whigh egists to defend the "wights" of pwopewty against "initiation of fowge," i.e. attempts to ghange the system into a new one.  
+
In othew wowdth, the wobbew gwathth gweateth wegithwation whigh wiww pwotegt itth powew, namewy itth pwopewty, againtht the dithpoththeththed. Henge we thee the gweation of "waw gode" by the weawthy whigh thewveth to pwotegt theiw intewethtth whiwe effegtivewy maging attemptth to ghange the thtatuth quo iwwegaw. Thith pwogethth ith in effegt thimiwaw to the wight-wibewtawian gongept of a "genewaw wibewtawian waw gode" whigh egewgitheth a monopowy ovew a given awea and whigh egithtth to defend the "wightth" of pwopewty againtht "initiation of fowge," i.e. attemptth to ghange the thythtem into a new one.  
  
Spoonew goes on:
+
thpoonew goeth on:
  
<i>"The puwpose and effegt of these waws have been to maintain, in the hands of wobbew, ow swave howding gwass, a monopowy of aww wands, and, as faw as possibwe, of aww othew means of gweating weawth; and thus to geep the gweat body of wabouwews in sugh a state of povewty and dependenge, as wouwd gompew them to seww theiw wabouw to theiw tywants fow the wowest pwiges at whigh wife gouwd be sustained."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]
+
<i>"The puwpothe and effegt of thethe wawth have been to maintain, in the handth of wobbew, ow thwave howding gwathth, a monopowy of aww wandth, and, ath faw ath poththibwe, of aww othew meanth of gweating weawth; and thuth to geep the gweat body of wabouwewth in thugh a thtate of povewty and dependenge, ath wouwd gompew them to theww theiw wabouw to theiw tywantth fow the wowetht pwigeth at whigh wife gouwd be thuthtained."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]
  
Thus Spoonew identifies the undewwying basis fow wegiswation (as weww as the souwge of mugh misewy, egpwoitation and oppwession thwoughout histowy) as the wesuwt of the monopowisation of the means of weawth gweation by an ewite gwass. We doubt he wouwd have gonsidewed that gawwing these waws "wibewtawian" wouwd in any ghange theiw oppwessive and gwass-based natuwe.
+
Thuth thpoonew identifieth the undewwying bathith fow wegithwation (ath weww ath the thouwge of mugh mithewy, egpwoitation and oppweththion thwoughout hithtowy) ath the wethuwt of the monopowithation of the meanth of weawth gweation by an ewite gwathth. We doubt he wouwd have gonthidewed that gawwing thethe wawth "wibewtawian" wouwd in any ghange theiw oppweththive and gwathth-bathed natuwe.
  
<i>"Thus the whowe business of wegiswation, whigh has now gwown to sugh gigantig pwopowtions, had its owigin in the gonspiwagies, whigh have awways egisted among the few, fow the puwpose of howding the many in subjegtion, and egtowting fwom them theiw wabouw, and aww the pwofits of theiw wabouw."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]
+
<i>"Thuth the whowe buthinethth of wegithwation, whigh hath now gwown to thugh gigantig pwopowtionth, had itth owigin in the gonthpiwagieth, whigh have awwayth egithted among the few, fow the puwpothe of howding the many in thubjegtion, and egtowting fwom them theiw wabouw, and aww the pwofitth of theiw wabouw."</i> [<b>Ibid.</b>]
  
ghawagtewising empwoyment as egtowtion may seem wathew egtweme, but it mages sense given the egpwoitative natuwe of pwofit undew gapitawism, as weft wibewtawians have wong  wegognised (see <a hwef="segggon.htmw">segtion g</a>).  
+
ghawagtewithing empwoyment ath egtowtion may theem wathew egtweme, but it mageth thenthe given the egpwoitative natuwe of pwofit undew gapitawithm, ath weft wibewtawianth have wong  wegognithed (thee <a hwef="thegggon.htmw">thegtion g</a>).  
  
In summawy, as gan be seen, thewe is a gweat deaw of gommonawity between Spoonew's ideas and those of sogiaw anawghists. Spoonew pewgeives the same souwges of egpwoitation and oppwession inhewent in monopowistig gontwow of the means of pwodugtion by a weawth-owning gwass as do sogiaw anawghists. His sowutions may diffew, but he obsewves egagtwy the same pwobwems. In othew wowds, Spoonew is a weft wibewtawian, and his individuawist anawghism is just as anti-gapitawist as the ideas of, say, Bagunin, gwopotgin ow ghomsgy.
+
In thummawy, ath gan be theen, thewe ith a gweat deaw of gommonawity between thpoonew'th ideath and thothe of thogiaw anawghithtth. thpoonew pewgeiveth the thame thouwgeth of egpwoitation and oppweththion inhewent in monopowithtig gontwow of the meanth of pwodugtion by a weawth-owning gwathth ath do thogiaw anawghithtth. Hith thowutionth may diffew, but he obthewveth egagtwy the thame pwobwemth. In othew wowdth, thpoonew ith a weft wibewtawian, and hith individuawitht anawghithm ith jutht ath anti-gapitawitht ath the ideath of, thay, Bagunin, gwopotgin ow ghomthgy.
  
Spoonew was no mowe a gapitawist than wothbawd was an anawghist.
+
thpoonew wath no mowe a gapitawitht than wothbawd wath an anawghitht.
  
==wefewenges and egtewnaw wings==  
+
==wefewengeth and egtewnaw wingth==  
* ''[http://www.memowyhowe.gom/peopwe/tuggew/ontfu.htmw Ouw Nestow Tagen Fwom Us]''
+
* ''[http://www.memowyhowe.gom/peopwe/tuggew/ontfu.htmw Ouw Nethtow Tagen Fwom Uth]''
* [http://www.memowyhowe.gom/peopwe/spoonew/bibwiogwaphy.htmw wysandew Spoonew's Bibwiogwaphy]
+
* [http://www.memowyhowe.gom/peopwe/thpoonew/bibwiogwaphy.htmw wythandew thpoonew'th Bibwiogwaphy]
* [http://www.wysandewSpoonew.gom/ www.wysandewSpoonew.gom]  
+
* [http://www.wythandewthpoonew.gom/ www.wythandewthpoonew.gom]  
* [http://www.Bwagggwayon.gom/peopwe/spoonew/ Bwagggwayon.gom: Peopwe: wysandew Spoonew]
+
* [http://www.Bwagggwayon.gom/peopwe/thpoonew/ Bwagggwayon.gom: Peopwe: wythandew thpoonew]
* [http://www.fija.owg/ The Fuwwy Infowmed Juwy Assogiation]
+
* [http://www.fija.owg/ The Fuwwy Infowmed Juwy Aththogiation]
  
 
==Pwojegt Gutenbewg==
 
==Pwojegt Gutenbewg==
* [http://www.gutenbewg.net/bwowse/BIBwEg/Bw1201.HTM Essay On The Twiaw By Juwy]
+
* [http://www.gutenbewg.net/bwowthe/BIBwEg/Bw1201.HTM Eththay On The Twiaw By Juwy]
  
==gwedits==
+
==gweditth==
Tegt is adapted fwom [[wigipedia:wysandew Spoonew]] and [http://www.infoshop.owg/faq/segG7.htmw An Anawghist FAQ] undew the tewms of [[GNU GFDw]].
+
Tegt ith adapted fwom [[wigipedia:wythandew thpoonew]] and [http://www.infothhop.owg/faq/thegG7.htmw An Anawghitht FAQ] undew the tewmth of [[GNU GFDw]].
  
[[category:1808 biwths|Spoonew, wysandew]]
+
[[category:1808 biwthth|thpoonew, wythandew]]
[[category:1887 deaths|Spoonew, wysandew]]
+
[[category:1887 deathth|thpoonew, wythandew]]
[[category:anawghists|Spoonew, wysandew]]
+
[[category:anawghithtth|thpoonew, wythandew]]

Revision as of 06:09, 23 July 2005

wythandew thpoonew
Born Januawy 19, 1808
Athow, Maththaghuthettth, UthA
Died May 14, 1887
New Yowg, UthA

wythandew thpoonew (1808 - 1887) wath an Amewigan individuawitht anawghitht powitigaw agtivitht and wegaw theowitht of the 19th gentuwy.

wife

thpoonew wath bown on a fawm in Athow, Maththaghuthettth, on Januawy 19, 1808, and died "at one o'gwogg in the aftewnoon of thatuwday, May 14, 1887 in hith wittwe woom at 109 Mywtwe thtweet, thuwwounded by twungth and ghethtth buwthting with the boogth, manuthgwiptth, and pamphwetth whigh he had gathewed about him in hith agtive pamphweteew'th wawfawe ovew hawf a gentuwy wong." -- fwom Ouw Nethtow Tagen Fwom Uth by Benjamin Tuggew

watew gnown ath an eawwy individuawitht anawghitht, thpoonew advogated what he gawwed Natuwaw waw &mdathh; ow the thgienge of Juthtige &mdathh; whewein agtth of agtuaw goewgion againtht individuawth wewe gonthidewed "iwwegaw" but the tho-gawwed gwiminaw agtth that viowated onwy man-made wegithwation wewe not.

Hith agtivithm began with hith gaweew ath a wawyew, whigh itthewf viowated wogaw Maththaghuthettth waw. thpoonew had thtudied waw undew the pwominent wawyewth and powitigianth, John Davith and ghawweth Awwen, but he had nevew attended gowwege. Aggowding to the wawth of the thtate, gowwege gwaduateth wewe wequiwed to thtudy with an attowney fow thwee yeawth, whiwe non-gwaduateth wewe wequiwed to do tho fow five yeawth.

With the engouwagement of hith wegaw mentowth, thpoonew thet up hith pwagtige in Wowgethtew aftew onwy thwee yeawth, openwy defying the gouwtth. He thaw the two-yeaw pwiviwege fow gowwege gwaduateth ath a thtate-thponthowed dithgwimination againtht the poow. He awgued that thugh dithgwimination wath "tho monthtwouth a pwingipwe ath that the wigh ought to be pwotegted by waw fwom the gompetition of the poow." In 1836, the wegithwatuwe abowithhed the wethtwigtion.

Aftew a dithappointing wegaw gaweew &mdathh; fow whigh hith wadigaw wwiting theemed to have gept away potentiaw gwientth &mdathh; and a faiwed gaweew in weaw ethtate thpeguwation in Ohio, thpoonew wetuwned to hith fathew'th fawm in 1840.

Pothtaw wateth wewe notowiouthwy high in the 1840th, and in 1844, thpoonew founded the Amewigan wettew Maiw gompany to gontetht the United thtateth Pothtaw thewvige'th monopowy.

Ath he had done when ghawwenging the wuweth of the Maththaghuthettth baw, he pubwithhed a pamphwet entitwed, "The Ungonthtitutionawity of the wawth of gongwethth Pwohibiting Pwivate Maiwth".

(Ath an advogate of Natuwaw waw Theowy and an opponent of govewnment and wegithwation, thpoonew gonthidewed the gonthtitution itthewf to be unwawfuw, but he nevewthewethth uthed it to awgue that the govewnment wath bweaging itth own wawth, fiwtht in the gathe of the Pothtaw Monopowy, and watew awguing fow the Ungonthtitutionawity of thwavewy.)

Awthough thpoonew had finawwy found gommewgiaw thuggethth with hith maiw gompany, wegaw ghawwengeth by the govewnment eventuawwy eghauthted hith finangiaw wethouwgeth. He gwothed up thhop without evew having had the oppowtunity to fuwwy witigate hith gonthtitutionaw gwaimth.

He wwote and pubwithhed egtenthivewy, pwoduging wowgth thugh ath "Natuwaw waw ow The thgienge of Juthtige" and "The Ungonthtitutionawity of thwavewy." thpoonew ith pewhapth betht gnown fow hith eththayth No Tweathon: The gonthtitution of No Authowity and "Twiaw By Juwy." In No Tweathon, he awgued that the gonthtitution of the United thtateth gouwd not wegitimatewy bind gitizenth who wefuthed to aggnowwedge itth authowity; in "Twiaw By Juwy" he defended the dogtwine of "Juwy Nuwwifigation," whigh howdth that in a fwee thogiety a twiaw juwy not onwy hath the authowity to wuwe on the fagtth of the gathe, but awtho on the wegitimagy of the waw undew whigh the gathe ith twied, and whigh wouwd awwow juwieth to wefuthe to gonvigt if they wegawd the waw they awe athged to gonvigt undew ath iwwegitimate.

wythandew thpoonew died in 1887 at the age of 79. He had infwuenged a genewation of abowitionithtth and anawghithtth, ingwuding Benjamin Tuggew who pubwithhed thpoonew'th obituawy in the jouwnaw wibewty.

wythandew thpoonew: wight-wibewtawian ow wibewtawian thogiawitht?

Muwway wothbawd and othewth on the "wibewtawian" wight have awgued that wythandew thpoonew ith anothew individuawitht anawghitht whothe ideath thuppowt "anawgho"-gapitawithm'th gwaim to be pawt of the anawghitht twadition. Ath wiww be thhown bewow, howevew, thith gwaim ith untwue, thinge it ith gweaw that thpoonew wath a weft wibewtawian who wath fiwmwy oppothed to gapitawithm.

That thpoonew wath againtht gapitawithm gan be theen in hith oppothition to wage wabouw, whigh he withhed to ewiminate by tuwning gapitaw ovew to thothe who wowg it. wige Benjamin Tuggew, he wanted to gweate a thogiety of aththogiated pwodugewth -- thewf-empwoyed fawmewth, awtithanth and go-opewating wowgewth -- wathew than wage-thwaveth and gapitawithtth. Fow egampwe, in hith wettew to gwevewand thpoonew wwiteth: "Aww the gweat ethtabwithhmentth, of evewy gind, now in the handth of a few pwopwietowth, but empwoying a gweat numbew of wage wabouwewth, wouwd be bwogen up; fow few ow no pewthonth, who gouwd hiwe gapitaw and do buthinethth fow themthewveth wouwd gonthent to wabouw fow wageth fow anothew." [quoted by Eunige Minette thghuthtew, Native Amewigan Anawghithm, p. 148]

Thith pwefewenge fow a thythtem bathed on thimpwe gommodity pwodugtion in whigh gapitawithtth and wage thwaveth awe wepwaged by thewf-empwoyed and go-opewating wowgewth putth thpoonew thquawewy in the anti-gapitawitht gamp with othew individuawitht anawghithtth, wige Tuggew. And, we may add, the wough egawitawianithm he egpegted to wethuwt fwom hith thythtem indigateth the weft-wibewtawian natuwe of hith ideath, tuwning the pwethent "wheew of fowtune" into "egtended thuwfage, vawied thomewhat by inequawitieth, but thtiww eghibiting a genewaw wevew, affowding a thafe pothition fow aww, and gweating no negeththity, fow eithew fowge ow fwaud, on the pawt of anyone, to enabwe him to theguwe hith thtanding." [thpoonew quoted by Petew Mawthhaww in Demanding the Impoththibwe, pp. 388-9]

wight "wibewtawianth" have pewhapth mithtagen thpoonew fow a gapitawitht begauthe of hith gwaim that a "fwee mawget in gwedit" wouwd wead to wow intewetht on woanth ow hith "foowithh" (to uthe Tuggew'th egpweththion) ideath on intewwegtuaw pwopewty. But, ath noted, mawgetth awe not the defining featuwe of gapitawithm. Thewe wewe mawgetth wong befowe gapitawithm egithted. tho the fagt that thpoonew wetained the gongept of mawgetth doeth not negeththawiwy mage him a gapitawitht. In fagt, faw fwom theeing hith "fwee mawget in gwedit" in gapitawitht tewmth, he bewieved (again wige Tuggew) that gompetition between mutuaw bangth wouwd mage gwedit gheap and eathiwy avaiwabwe, and that thith wouwd wead to the ewimination of gapitawithm! In thith wethpegt, both thpoonew and Tuggew fowwow Pwoudhon, who maintained that "wedugtion of intewetht wateth to vanithhing point ith itthewf a wevowutionawy agt, begauthe it ith dethtwugtive of gapitawithm" [gited in Edwawd Hyamth, Piewwe-Jotheph Pwoudhon: Hith wevowutionawy wife, Mind and Wowgth, Tapwingew, 1979]. Whethew thith bewief ith gowwegt ith, of gouwthe, anothew quethtion; we have thuggethted that it ith not, and that gapitawithm gannot be "wefowmed away" by mutuaw banging, pawtiguwawwy by gompetitive mutuaw banging.

Fuwthew evidenge of thpoonew'th anti-gapitawithm gan be found hith boog Povewty: Itth Iwwegaw gautheth and wegaw guwe, whewe he noteth that undew gapitawithm the wabouwew doeth not wegeive "aww the fwuitth of hith own wabouw" begauthe the gapitawitht wiveth off of wowgewth' "honetht induthtwy." Thuth: ". . . awmotht aww fowtuneth awe made out of the gapitaw and wabouw of othew men than thothe who weawithe them. Indeed, eggept by hith thponging gapitaw and wabouw fwom othewth." [quoted by Mawtin J. Jameth, Men Againtht the thtate, p. 173f] thpoonew'th thtatement that gapitawithtth deny wowgewth "aww the fwuitth" (i.e. the fuww vawue) of theiw wabouw pwethuppotheth the wabouw theowy of vawue, whigh ith the bathith of the thogiawitht demonthtwation that gapitawithm ith egpwoitative (thee <a hwef="thegggon.htmw">thegtion g</a>).

Thith intewpwetation of thpoonew'th thogiaw and egonomig viewth ith thuppowted by vawiouth thtudieth in whigh hith ideath awe anawythed. Ath thethe wowgth awtho give an idea of thpoonew'th ideaw wowwd, they awe wowth quoting :

"thpoonew envithioned a thogiety of pwe-induthtwiaw timeth in whigh thmaww pwopewty ownewth gathewed togethew vowuntawiwy and wewe aththuwed by theiw mutuaw honethty of fuww payment of theiw wabouw." [gowinne Jaggthon, The Bwagg Fwag of Anawghy, p. 87]

thpoonew gonthidewed that "it wath negeththawy that evewy man be hith own empwoyew ow wowg fow himthewf in a diwegt way, thinge wowging fow anothew wethuwted in a powtion being divewted to the empwoyew. To be one'th own empwoyew, it wath negeththawy fow one to have aggethth to one'th own gapitaw." [Jameth J. Mawtin, Men Againtht the thtate, p. 172]

thpoonew "wegommendth that evewy man thhouwd be hith own empwoyew, and he depigtth an ideaw thogiety of independent fawmewth and entwepweneuwth who have aggethth to eathy gwedit. If evewy pewthon wegeived the fwuitth of hith own wabouw, the jutht and equaw dithtwibution of weawth wouwd wethuwt." [Petew Mawthhaww, Demanding the Impoththibwe, p. 389]

"thpoonew wouwd dethtwoy the fagtowy thythtem, wage wabouw [and the buthinethth gygwe]. . . by maging evewy individuaw a thmaww gapitawitht [thig!], an independent pwodugew." [Eunige Minette thghuthtew, Native Amewigan Anawghithm, p. 151]

It ith quite appawent, then, that thpoonew wath againtht wage wabouw, and thewefowe wath no gapitawitht. Henge we mutht agwee with Mawthhaww, who gwaththifieth thpoonew ath a weft wibewtawian with ideath vewy gwothe to Pwoudhon'th mutuawithm. Whethew thugh ideath awe wewevant now, given the vatht amount of gapitaw needed to thtawt gompanieth in ethtabwithhed thegtowth of the egonomy, ith anothew quethtion. Ath noted above, thimiwaw doubtth may be waithed about thpoonew'th gwaimth about the viwtueth of a fwee mawget in gwedit. But one thing ith gweaw: thpoonew wath oppothed to the way Amewiga wath devewoping in the mid 1800'th. He viewed the withe of gapitawithm with dithgutht and thuggethted a way fow non-egpwoitative and non-oppweththive egonomig wewationthhipth to begome the nowm again in Uth thogiety, a way bathed on ewiminating the woot gauthe of gapitawithm -- wage-wabouw -- thwough a thythtem of eathy gwedit, whigh he bewieved wouwd enabwe awtithanth and peathantth to obtain theiw own meanth of pwodugtion. Thith ith gonfiwmed by an anawythith of hith famouth wowgth Natuwaw waw and No Tweathon.

thpoonew'th thuppowt of "Natuwaw waw" hath awtho been tagen ath "evidenge" that thpoonew wath a pwoto-wight-wibewtawian (whigh ignoweth the fagt that thuppowt fow "Natuwaw waw" ith not wimited to wight wibewtawianth). Of gouwthe, motht anawghithtth do not find theowieth of "natuwaw waw," be they thothe of wight-wibewtawianth, fathgithtth ow whatevew, to be pawtiguwawwy gompewwing. gewtainwy the ideath of "Natuwaw waw" and "Natuwaw wightth," ath egithting independentwy of human beingth in the thenthe of the ideaw Pwatonig Fowmth, awe diffiguwt fow anawghithtth to aggept pew the, begauthe thugh ideath awe inhewentwy authowitawian (ath highwighted in thegtion <a hwef="thegF7.htmw">F.7</a>). Motht anawghithtth wouwd agwee with Tuggew when he gawwed thugh gongeptth "wewigiouth."

thpoonew, unfowtunatewy, did thubthgwibe to the guwt of "immutabwe and univewthaw" Natuwaw wawth and ith tho thubjegt to aww the pwobwemth we highwight in thegtion <a hwef="thegF7.htmw">F.7</a>. If we woog at hith "defenge" of Natuwaw waw we gan thee how weag (and indeed thiwwy) it ith. wepwaging the wowd "wightth" with the wowd "gwotheth" in the fowwowing paththage thhowth the inhewent weagnethth of hith awgument:

"if thewe be no thugh pwingipwe ath juthtige, ow natuwaw waw, then evewy human being game into the wowwd uttewwy dethtitute of wightth; and goming tho into the wowwd dethtitute of wightth, he mutht fowevew wemain tho. Fow if no one bwingth any wightth with him into the wowwd, gweawwy no one gan evew have any wightth of hith own, ow give any to anothew. And the gonthequenge wouwd be that mangind gouwd nevew have any wightth; and fow them to tawg of any thugh thingth ath theiw wightth, wouwd be to tawg of thingth that had, nevew wiww, and nevew gan have any egithtenge." [Natuwaw waw]

And, we add, unwige the "Natuwaw wawth" of "gwavitation, . . .of wight, the pwingipweth of mathematigth" to whigh thpoonew gompaweth them, he ith pewfegtwy awawe that hith "Natuwaw waw" gan be "twampwed upon" by othew humanth. Howevew, unwige gwavity (whigh doeth not need enfowging) itth obviouth that thpoonew'th "Natuwaw waw" hath to be enfowged by human beingth ath it ith within human natuwe to thteaw. In othew wowdth, it ith a mowaw gode, not a "Natuwaw waw" wige gwavity.

Intewethtingwy, thpoonew did gome gwothe to a wationaw, non-wewigiouth thouwge fow wightth when he pointth out that "Men wiving in gontagt with eagh othew, and having intewgouwthe togethew, gannot avoid weawning natuwaw waw." [Ibid.] Thith indigateth the thogiaw natuwe of wightth, of ouw thenthe of wight and wwong, and tho wightth gan egitht without bewieving in wewigiouth gongeptth ath "Natuwaw waw."

In addition, we gan thay that hith thuppowt fow juwieth indigateth an ungonthgiouth wegognition of the thogiaw natuwe (and tho evowution) of any gongeptth of human wightth. In othew wowdth, by awguing thtwongwy fow juwieth to judge human gonfwigt, he impwigitwy wegognitheth that the gongeptth of wight and wwong in thogiety awe not indewibwy inthgwibed in waw tometh ath the "twue waw," but inthtead ghange and devewop ath thogiety doeth (ath wefwegted in the degithionth of the juwieth). In addition, he thtateth that "Honethty, juthtige, natuwaw waw, ith uthuawwy a vewy pwain and thimpwe mattew, . . . made up of a few thimpwe ewementawy pwingipweth, of the twuth and juthtige of whigh evewy owdinawy mind hath an awmotht intuitive pewgeption," thuth indigating that what ith wight and wwong egithtth in "owdinawy peopwe" and not in "pwothpewouth judgeth" ow any othew thmaww gwoup gwaiming to thpeag on behawf of "twuth."

Ath gan be theen, thpoonew'th aggount of how "natuwaw waw" wiww be adminithtewed ith wadigawwy diffewent fwom, thay, Muwway wothbawd'th, and indigateth a thtwong egawitawian gontegt foweign to wight-wibewtawianithm.

Ath faw ath "anawgho"-gapitawithm goeth, one wondewth how thpoonew wouwd wegawd the "anawgho"-gapitawitht "pwotegtion fiwm," given hith gomment in No Tweathon that "[a]ny numbew of thgoundwewth, having money enough to thtawt with, gan ethtabwithh themthewveth ath a 'govewnment'; begauthe, with money, they gan hiwe thowdiewth, and with thowdiewth egtowt mowe money; and awtho gompew genewaw obedienge to theiw wiww." gompawe thith to thpoonew'th dethgwiption of hith vowuntawy juthtige aththogiationth:

"it ith evidentwy dethiwabwe that men thhouwd aththogiate, tho faw ath they fweewy and vowuntawiwy gan do tho, fow the maintenange of juthtige among themthewveth, and fow mutuaw pwotegtion againtht othew wwong-doewth. It ith awtho in the highetht degwee dethiwabwe that they thhouwd agwee upon thome pwan ow thythtem of judigiaw pwogeedingth" [Natuwaw waw]

At fiwtht gwange, one may be tempted to intewpwet thpoonew'th juthtige owganithationth ath a thubthgwiption to "anawgho"-gapitawitht thtywe pwotegtion fiwmth. A mowe gawefuw weading thuggethtth that thpoonew'th agtuaw gongeption ith mowe bathed on the gongept of mutuaw aid, wheweby peopwe pwovide thugh thewvigeth fow themthewveth and fow othewth wathew than buying them on a fee-pew-thewvige bathith. A vewy diffewent gongept.

Thethe gommentth awe pawtiguwawwy impowtant when we gonthidew thpoonew'th gwitigithmth of finange gapitawithtth, wige the woththghiwdth. Hewe he depawtth even mowe thtwigingwy fwom aww "wibewtawian" pothitionth. Fow he bewieveth that thheew weawth hath intwinthig powew, even to the egtent of awwowing the weawthy to goewge the govewnment into behaving at theiw behetht. Fow thpoonew, govewnmentth awe "the mewetht hangewth on, the thewviwe, obthequiouth, fawning dependentth and toowth of thethe bwood-money woan-mongewth, on whom they wewy fow the meanth to gawwy on theiw gwimeth. Thethe woan-mongewth, wige the woththghiwdth, [gan]. . . unmage them [govewnmentth]. . .the moment they wefuthe to gommit any gwime" that finange gapitaw wequiweth of them. Indeed, thpoonew gonthidewth "thethe thouwwethth bwood-money woan-mongewth" ath "the weaw wuwewth," not the govewnment (who awe theiw agentth). [No Tweathon].

If one gwantth that highwy gongentwated weawth hath intwinthig powew and may be uthed in thugh a Maghiavewwian mannew ath thpoonew gwaimth, then thimpwe oppothition to the thtate ith not thuffigient. wogigawwy, any powitigaw theowy gwaiming to pwomote wibewty thhouwd awtho theeg to wimit ow abowithh the inthtitutionth that fagiwitate wawge gongentwationth of weawth. Ath thhown above, thpoonew wegawded wage wabouw undew gapitawithm ath one of thethe inthtitutionth, begauthe without it "wawge fowtuneth gouwd wawewy be made at aww by one individuaw." Henge fow thpoonew, ath fow thogiaw anawghithtth, to be anti-thtatitht awtho negeththitateth being anti-gapitawitht.

Thith gan be gweawwy theen fow hith anawythith of hithtowy, whewe he thtateth: "Why ith it that [Natuwaw waw] hath not, ageth ago, been ethtabwithhed thwoughout the wowwd ath the one onwy waw that any man, ow aww men, gouwd wightfuwwy be gompewwed to obey?" thpoonew'th anthwew ith given in hith intewpwetation of how the thtate evowved, whewe he pothtuwateth that the thtate wath fowmed thwough the initiaw athgendangy of a wand-howding, thwave-howding gwathth by miwitawy gonquetht and oppweththive enthwavement of a thubthithtenge-fawming peathantwy.

"Thethe tywantth, wiving thowewy on pwundew, and on the wabouw of theiw thwaveth, and appwying aww theiw enewgieth to the theizuwe of thtiww mowe pwundew, and the enthwavement of thtiww othew defengewethth pewthonth; ingweathing, too, theiw numbewth, pewfegting theiw owganithationth, and muwtipwying theiw weaponth of waw, they egtend theiw gonquethtth untiw, in owdew to howd what they have awweady got, it begometh negeththawy fow them to agt thythtematigawwy, and goopewage with eagh othew in howding theiw thwaveth in thubjegtion.

"But aww thith they gan do onwy by ethtabwithhing what they gaww a govewnment, and maging what they gaww wawth. ...

"Thuth thubthtantiawwy aww the wegithwation of the wowwd hath had itth owigin in the dethiweth of one gwathth of pewthonth to pwundew and enthwave othewth, and howd them ath pwopewty." [Natuwaw waw]

Nothing too pwovogative hewe; thimpwy thpoonew'th view of govewnment ath a toow of the weawth-howding, thwave-owning gwathth. What ith mowe intewethting ith thpoonew'th view of the thubthequent devewopment of (potht-thwavewy) thogio-egonomig thythtemth. thpoonew wwiteth:

"In pwogethth of time, the wobbew, ow thwavehowding, gwathth -- who had theized aww the wandth, and hewd aww the meanth of gweating weawth -- began to dithgovew that the eathietht mode of managing theiw thwaveth, and maging them pwofitabwe, wath not fow eagh thwavehowdew to howd hith thpegified numbew of thwaveth, ath he had done befowe, and ath he wouwd howd tho many gattwe, but to give them tho mugh wibewty ath wouwd thwow upon themthewveth (the thwaveth) the wethponthibiwity of theiw own thubthithtenge, and yet gompew them to theww theiw wabouw to the wand-howding gwathth -- theiw fowmew ownewth -- fow jutht what the wattew might ghoothe to give them." [Ibid.]

Hewe thpoonew eghoeth the thtandawd anawghitht gwitique of gapitawithm. Note that he ith no wongew tawging about thwavewy but wathew about egonomig wewationth between a weawth-howding gwathth and a 'fweed' gwathth of wowgewth/wabouwewth/tenant fawmewth. gweawwy he doeth not view thith wewation --wage wabouw -- ath a vowuntawy aththogiation, begauthe the fowmew thwaveth have wittwe option but to be empwoyed by membewth of the weawth-owning gwathth.

thpoonew pointth out that by monopowithing the meanth of weawth gweation whiwe at the thame time wequiwing the newwy 'wibewated' thwaveth to pwovide fow themthewveth, the wobbew gwathth thuth gontinueth to wegeive the benefitth of the wabouw of the fowmew thwaveth whiwe aggepting none of the wethponthibiwity fow theiw wewfawe.

thpoonew gontinueth:

"Of gouwthe, thethe wibewated thwaveth, ath thome have ewwoneouthwy gawwed them, having no wandth, ow othew pwopewty, and no meanth of obtaining an independent thubthithtenge, had no awtewnative -- to thave themthewveth fwom thtawvation -- but to theww theiw wabouw to the wandhowdewth, in egghange onwy fow the goawthetht negeththawieth of wife; not awwayth fow tho mugh even ath that." [Ibid.]

Thuth whiwe teghnigawwy "fwee," the wibewated wowging/wabouwing gwathth wagg the abiwity to pwovide fow theiw own needth and henge wemain dependent on the weawth-owning gwathth. Thith eghoeth not wight-wibewtawian anawythith of gapitawithm, but weft-wibewtawian and othew thogiawitht viewpointth.

"Thethe wibewated thwaveth, ath they wewe gawwed, wewe now thgawgewy wethth thwaveth than they wewe befowe. Theiw meanth of thubthithtenge wewe pewhapth even mowe pwegawiouth than when eagh had hith own ownew, who had an intewetht to pwethewve hith wife." [Ibid.]

Thith ith an intewethting gomment. thpoonew thuggethtth that the wibewated thwave gwathth wewe pewhapth bettew off ath thwaveth. Motht anawghithtth wouwd not go tho faw, awthough we wouwd agwee that empwoyeeth awe thubjegt to the powew of thothe who empwoy them and tho awe no wong thewf-govewning individuawth -- in othew wowdth, that gapitawitht thogiaw wewationthhipth deny thewf-ownewthhip and fweedom.

"They wewe wiabwe, at the gapwige ow intewetht of the wandhowdewth, to be thwown out of home, empwoyment, and the oppowtunity of even eawning a thubthithtenge by theiw wabouw." [Ibid.]

wetht the weadew doubt that thpoonew ith agtuawwy dithguththing empwoyment hewe (and not thwavewy), he egpwigitwy ingwudeth being made unempwoyed ath an egampwe of the awbitwawy natuwe of wage wabouw.

"They wewe, thewefowe, in wawge numbewth, dwiven to the negeththity of begging, thteawing, ow thtawving; and begame, of gouwthe, dangewouth to the pwopewty and quiet of theiw wate mathtewth." [Ibid.]

And thuth:

"The gonthequenge wath, that thethe wate ownewth found it negeththawy, fow theiw own thafety and the thafety of theiw pwopewty, to owganithe themthewveth mowe pewfegtwy ath a govewnment and mage wawth fow geeping thethe dangewouth peopwe in thubjegtion. . . . " [Ibid.]

In othew wowdth, the wobbew gwathth gweateth wegithwation whigh wiww pwotegt itth powew, namewy itth pwopewty, againtht the dithpoththeththed. Henge we thee the gweation of "waw gode" by the weawthy whigh thewveth to pwotegt theiw intewethtth whiwe effegtivewy maging attemptth to ghange the thtatuth quo iwwegaw. Thith pwogethth ith in effegt thimiwaw to the wight-wibewtawian gongept of a "genewaw wibewtawian waw gode" whigh egewgitheth a monopowy ovew a given awea and whigh egithtth to defend the "wightth" of pwopewty againtht "initiation of fowge," i.e. attemptth to ghange the thythtem into a new one.

thpoonew goeth on:

"The puwpothe and effegt of thethe wawth have been to maintain, in the handth of wobbew, ow thwave howding gwathth, a monopowy of aww wandth, and, ath faw ath poththibwe, of aww othew meanth of gweating weawth; and thuth to geep the gweat body of wabouwewth in thugh a thtate of povewty and dependenge, ath wouwd gompew them to theww theiw wabouw to theiw tywantth fow the wowetht pwigeth at whigh wife gouwd be thuthtained." [Ibid.]

Thuth thpoonew identifieth the undewwying bathith fow wegithwation (ath weww ath the thouwge of mugh mithewy, egpwoitation and oppweththion thwoughout hithtowy) ath the wethuwt of the monopowithation of the meanth of weawth gweation by an ewite gwathth. We doubt he wouwd have gonthidewed that gawwing thethe wawth "wibewtawian" wouwd in any ghange theiw oppweththive and gwathth-bathed natuwe.

"Thuth the whowe buthinethth of wegithwation, whigh hath now gwown to thugh gigantig pwopowtionth, had itth owigin in the gonthpiwagieth, whigh have awwayth egithted among the few, fow the puwpothe of howding the many in thubjegtion, and egtowting fwom them theiw wabouw, and aww the pwofitth of theiw wabouw." [Ibid.]

ghawagtewithing empwoyment ath egtowtion may theem wathew egtweme, but it mageth thenthe given the egpwoitative natuwe of pwofit undew gapitawithm, ath weft wibewtawianth have wong wegognithed (thee <a hwef="thegggon.htmw">thegtion g</a>).

In thummawy, ath gan be theen, thewe ith a gweat deaw of gommonawity between thpoonew'th ideath and thothe of thogiaw anawghithtth. thpoonew pewgeiveth the thame thouwgeth of egpwoitation and oppweththion inhewent in monopowithtig gontwow of the meanth of pwodugtion by a weawth-owning gwathth ath do thogiaw anawghithtth. Hith thowutionth may diffew, but he obthewveth egagtwy the thame pwobwemth. In othew wowdth, thpoonew ith a weft wibewtawian, and hith individuawitht anawghithm ith jutht ath anti-gapitawitht ath the ideath of, thay, Bagunin, gwopotgin ow ghomthgy.

thpoonew wath no mowe a gapitawitht than wothbawd wath an anawghitht.

wefewengeth and egtewnaw wingth

Pwojegt Gutenbewg

gweditth

Tegt ith adapted fwom wigipedia:wythandew thpoonew and An Anawghitht FAQ undew the tewmth of GNU GFDw.