Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "Anti-vaccinationism"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (anti-penguinism moved to anti-penguinism with penguins)
 
(26 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Anti-vaccinationists'''.  This article deals with those who, on principled or various other grounds, oppose [[vaccination]].  Since 1798, when vaccination had yet to become a standard part of [[public health]] and [[medicine]], there have been groups and individuals who are most clearly characterised as anti-vaccinationists, the first by their chosen name, opposing such policies. [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/antivaccinationist| wiktionary], [http://www.freedict.co.uk/words/a/antivaccinationist.php|Webster 1913], [http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=anti-vaccinationist|G 1470]
+
'''Anti-vaccinationism''' is a term used to describe those who, for various reasons, oppose [[vaccination]].  Since the process of vaccination has become a standard part of [[public health]] and [[medicine]], there have been groups and individuals who opposed vaccinationions.
  
It is possible they have done some goodIt is demonstrable that harm has resulted from their activity.
+
== Brief history ==
 +
Efforts by individuals and communities to avoid death of infectious diseases have been recorded since at least [[Hippocrates]], as have disagreements on their detailModern states assert an interest in and a right to control aspects of these efforts.  
  
The focus of the article is their identity as a group or class, and the genesis and evolution of the repeating arguments, which have shown limited change  with time and according to the specific vaccines discussed.  These constitute and are discussed as a distinct topic rather than as part of the discussion of [[infectious disease]]s and their control.
 
 
Technical detail such as the timing of vaccinations are discussed in [[vaccination schedule]] and elsewhere and are outside the scope of the intended topic.
 
 
Wolfe and Sharp (2002) argue that between the 19th and 20th century the arguments against vaccination used by anti-vaccinationists remained essentially unchanged. Their paper and others offer views regarded as partial.
 
 
== Time course ==
 
Efforts by individuals and communities to avoid death of infectious diseases have been recorded since at least [[Hippocrates]], as have disagreements on their detail.  Modern states assert an interest in and a right to control  aspects of these efforts.
 
 
[[Image:Edward Jenner2.jpg|left|thumb|Portrait of Jenner]]
 
 
Widespread vaccination began in the UK, in the early 1800s, after [[Edward Jenner]].  It succeeded [[variolation]].     
 
Widespread vaccination began in the UK, in the early 1800s, after [[Edward Jenner]].  It succeeded [[variolation]].     
  
Line 27: Line 18:
 
In the United States, [[smallpox]] outbreaks had become contained by the latter half of the 19th century.  Vaccination had been widespread in the early part the century, and before that smallpox had been widespread.  Vaccination then fell into disuse. In the 1870s the disease became epidemic, the population therefore being demonstrated to be susceptible.
 
In the United States, [[smallpox]] outbreaks had become contained by the latter half of the 19th century.  Vaccination had been widespread in the early part the century, and before that smallpox had been widespread.  Vaccination then fell into disuse. In the 1870s the disease became epidemic, the population therefore being demonstrated to be susceptible.
  
Anti-vaccination activity also increased in the United States in the latter part of the 19th century.  In 1879, after a visit to New York by [[William Tebb]], the leading British anti-vaccinationist, the Anti-Vaccination Society of America was founded. Subsequently, the New England Anti-Compulsory Vaccination League was formed in 1882 and the Anti-Vaccination League of New York City in 1885.
+
Anti-vaccination activity also increased in the United States in the latter part of the 19th century.  In 1879, after a visit to New York by [[William Tebb]], a British citizen opposed to vaccination, the Anti-Vaccination Society of America was founded. Subsequently, the New England Anti-Compulsory Vaccination League was formed in 1882 and the Anti-Vaccination League of New York City in 1885.
  
 
=== Initial arguments ===
 
=== Initial arguments ===
  
====Individual Freedom====
+
Arguments against compulsion gained considerable support. In the UK and abroad, when vaccination was introduced there are reports of individual clergymen supporting objections to it.  Since the same applied to the potato, it is not clear that there was a special religious angle.
Arguments against compulsion gained considerable support. See [[Anti-vaccinationists/arguments against compulsion]]
+
  
====Religion====
+
Prior to Pasteur's work there had been several clear assertions that contagion spread from person to person. Prior to the availability of microscopes the nature of that contagion - [[microbes]] - could not be elucidated.  After that time, and as demonstrated by Semmelweiss, Lister and others, the knowledge that there were specific modes of cross-infection and that there were means to avoid them diffused through the population, though other safety concerns surrounding specific vaccines do exist, particularly the live-agent vaccines and "preserved" vaccines which contain potentially toxic compounds.
In the UK and abroad, when vaccination was introduced there are reports of individual clergymen supporting objections to it. Since the same applied to the potato, it is not clear that there was a special religious angle.  See [[Vaccination/Vaccination-religion|Vaccination/religion]]
+
  
====Safety====
 
Prior to Pasteur's work there had been several clear assertions that contagion spread from person to person.  Prior to the availability of microscopes the nature of that contagion - [[microbes]] - could not be elucidated.  After that time,and as demonstrated by Semmelweiss, Lister and others, teh knowledge that there were specific modes of cross-infection and that there were means to avoid them diffused through the population.
 
  
== Harm Resulting from Anti-vaccinationist Activity ==
 
In several countries since 1960 reductions in uptake of specific vaccines have been followed by measured increases in illness and deaths, which have then regressed following a rise in uptake.  See [[Anti-vaccinationists/Harm done by successes|harm done]]
 
  
== Good Which Resulted from Anti-vaccinationist Activity ==
 
<!-- this is an invitingly open space.  -->
 
  
  
<!-- two lines above summarising it would be a sensible lead in to a sub-page of arbitrary prolongation.
 
<!-- this is where to put it-->
 
See [[Anti-vaccinationists/Good resulted from successes|good done]]
 
  
 
==Character of anti-vaccinationist material==
 
 
Anti-vaccination writing, and writing by anti-vaccinationists, on the [[Internet|Web]] and previously on paper, is characterised by a number of distinct differences from medical and other scientific literature.  As well as the underlying thesis to argue and subtle elements of style better analysed by a professor of [[English (language)|English]], these include:
 
 
* [[Promiscuity|promiscuous]] copying and reduplication{{fact}}
 
* Tendency to be without corrections, even when an initial report is shown to be false (eg Donnegan and Schreiber references below).  See also [[Anti-vaccinationist/absent_correction|absent_correction]]
 
* Deficiency of [[Citation|references]] to allow readers, should they wish, to check sources [http://adc.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/abstract/archdischild%3b87/1/22]
 
* Personal and sometimes scurrilous attacks on individual doctors
 
* An underlying acceptance that, 'of course', the whole of medicine is aimed at doing harm, eg whale.to/a/medical_mafia.html
 
* carefully dishonest arguments
 
 
In addition, there is a considerable overlap with [[homeopathy]] and [[conspiracy theorist]]s, and a subset of the material shades into the appearance of [[psychosis]] [http://www.aapsonline.org/jpands/vol8no2/schlafly.pdf.]
 
 
 
An example of a carefully dishonest argument would be to move from the claimed - that immunisation reduces disease - to dismissing immunisation as ineffective, since it has not eliminated any disease.  Even this only works until 1979, when Smallpox was eradicated, or at most contemporary time when polio having been '''eliminated''' as distinct from eradicated, in the USA and UK, the change from a live vaccine to a killed one occurs.
 
 
See Mendelsohn quote below
 
  
 
==The People==
 
==The People==
Line 81: Line 43:
  
 
The aims of the protesters and organisations had thus been achieved in '''1898'''.
 
The aims of the protesters and organisations had thus been achieved in '''1898'''.
{{Mergefrom|National_Anti-Vaccination_League}}
 
===== tables =====
 
 
 
{|{{prettytable}}
 
|  Name                                || Started  || Finished  || Location  ||  Membership  ||  Unique Proposition  || Notes
 
|-
 
|Anti-vaccination Society              || 1798    ||          || England    ||              || new = bad?          || Remarkably quick off the mark<br>Surely they came from anti-variolationists?       
 
|-
 
| Anti-Compulsory Vaccination League  || 1866  || 1880 (segue)||          ||              ||                      ||Mr. R. B. Gibbs (d. 1871) started it {{citation needed}}.  Revived 1876, President: Rev. W. Hume-Rothery
 
|-
 
|London Society for the Abolition of Compulsory Vaccination|| 1880 || 1896 (segue) ||Victoria Street, Westminster, London||              ||                          |||Secretary: Mr. William Young.  Adopted ''The Vaccination Inquirer''  established 1879 [[William Tebb]] as the organ of the Society. 
 
Published:-<br>
 
<small>
 
*14 "Vaccination Tracts" 1877 - completed by Dr. Garth Wilkinson in 1879.
 
* [[1879]], "Vaccination Tracts"
 
* [[1882]] THE FABLE OF THE SMALL-POX HOSPITAL NURSES SAVED FROM SMALL-POX BY RE-VACCINATION
 
* April [[1883]] to March [[1884]], ''The Vaccination Inquirer'' Vol V (book)
 
</small>
 
The movement grew {{fact}} and the London Society soon became national so reformed as ...
 
|-
 
| [[National Anti-Vaccination League]]  || 1896 (Feb)|| before 1970? || England  ||              ||
 
objectives:—
 
''The entire repeal of the Vaccination Acts; the disestablishment and disendowment of the practice of vaccination; and the abolition of all regulations in regard to vaccination as conditions, of employment in State Departments, or of admission to Educational, or other Institutions.''{{fact}}<br>
 
Added in [[1921]]:— ''and vindication of the legitimate freedom of the subject in matters of medical treatment.''
 
 
                    ||  ||
 
 
|-
 
 
| Anti-vaccination Society        || mid-C19  ||            ||  Boston USA        ||              ||  "the law of god prohibits the practice,"                  {{fact}} ||    ||
 
|-
 
|          ||  ||            ||          ||              ||                      ||   
 
|-
 
 
 
|}
 
 
 
 
A rather separate organisation with a general anti-vaccination view but with other more significant characteristics was the [[Naziism|Nazi party]].
 
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/opinion/mg18725131.600
 
  
 
==== Current ====
 
==== Current ====
Since the reversion from compulsory immunisation in the UK, (... other states...) opposition has continued, albeit at a low level and with the termination of the national organisations set up to oppose compulsion (see their charters).
+
Since the reversion from compulsory immunisation in the UK, opposition has continued, albeit at a low level and with the termination of the national organisations set up to oppose compulsion.
  
 
This opposition could no longer focus upon the abridgement of vicarious individual liberty - the right to determine what is done to one's children - and adopted the arguments that immunisation did not have an effect; that it had an effect but the effect was overwhelmingly bad; or that although immunisation had a beneficial effect that beneficial effect was less than lifelong and produced perverse consequences.
 
This opposition could no longer focus upon the abridgement of vicarious individual liberty - the right to determine what is done to one's children - and adopted the arguments that immunisation did not have an effect; that it had an effect but the effect was overwhelmingly bad; or that although immunisation had a beneficial effect that beneficial effect was less than lifelong and produced perverse consequences.
  
 
This was a change of ground and toward hypotheses that in theory require evidence and are susceptible to disproof rather than the philosophical questions of the relationship of individuals to state or deity.  Accordingly, scientific investigation has been undertaken, and also accordingly subsidiary arguments essentially consisting of the serial assertion that each scientific investigation which did not prove one of those hypotheses had been incorrectly designed, conducted, interpreted or punctuated and spelled.
 
This was a change of ground and toward hypotheses that in theory require evidence and are susceptible to disproof rather than the philosophical questions of the relationship of individuals to state or deity.  Accordingly, scientific investigation has been undertaken, and also accordingly subsidiary arguments essentially consisting of the serial assertion that each scientific investigation which did not prove one of those hypotheses had been incorrectly designed, conducted, interpreted or punctuated and spelled.
 
=== General ===
 
<!-- further research is needed (may have been done elsewhere) to characterise them.  Do they come, did they come in the C19,  from all walks of life, or are they middle class, are the professions and certain religions under-represented among them, what sort of strata and groups of society are fertile recruiting grounds or generate this phenomenon?  -->
 
 
 
 
 
=== Specific People===
 
<!-- arguably of note-->
 
See [[Anti-vaccinationist/Individuals]]
 
  
 
== The State ==
 
== The State ==
Line 145: Line 55:
 
"Vaccination is unique among de facto mandatory requirements in the modern era, requiring individuals to accept the injection of a medicine or medicinal agent into their bodies, and it has provoked a spirited opposition. This opposition began with the first vaccinations, has not ceased, and probably never will. From this realisation arises a difficult issue: how should the mainstream medical authorities approach the anti-vaccination movement? A passive reaction could be construed as endangering the health of society, whereas a heavy handed approach can threaten the values of individual liberty and freedom of expression that we cherish." BMJ
 
"Vaccination is unique among de facto mandatory requirements in the modern era, requiring individuals to accept the injection of a medicine or medicinal agent into their bodies, and it has provoked a spirited opposition. This opposition began with the first vaccinations, has not ceased, and probably never will. From this realisation arises a difficult issue: how should the mainstream medical authorities approach the anti-vaccination movement? A passive reaction could be construed as endangering the health of society, whereas a heavy handed approach can threaten the values of individual liberty and freedom of expression that we cherish." BMJ
  
Some of the United States in America make no requirement for immunisation, but a legislative requirement{{fact}} for immunisation before admission to school, and another for schooling. An overlap between followers of contemporary anti-vaccinationists and [[home-school]]ers must arise from this.
+
Some of the United States in America make no requirement for immunisation, but a legislative requirement for immunisation before admission to school, and another for schooling. An overlap between followers of contemporary anti-vaccinationists and [[home-school]]ers must arise from this.
  
 
==Anti-Vaccinists quotes==
 
==Anti-Vaccinists quotes==
Line 158: Line 68:
  
 
*[[1884]] Compulsory Vaccination in England by William Tebb [http://www.vaccination.org.uk/v/tebb1/part.html]
 
*[[1884]] Compulsory Vaccination in England by William Tebb [http://www.vaccination.org.uk/v/tebb1/part.html]
*[[1898]] VACCINATION A DELUSION by [[Alfred Russel Wallace]] [http://www.vaccination.org.uk/vaccine/wallace/book1.html]
+
*[[1898]] Vaccination A Delusion by [[Alfred Russel Wallace]] [http://www.vaccination.org.uk/vaccine/wallace/book1.html]
*[[1936]] The Case AGAINST Vaccination By M. [[Beddow Bayly]] M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P. [http://www.vaccination.org.uk/vaccines/bayly.html]
+
*[[1936]] The Case Against Vaccination By M. [[Beddow Bayly]] M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P. [http://www.vaccination.org.uk/vaccines/bayly.html]
 
*[[1951]] The Truth About Vaccination and Immunization by Lily Loat [http://www.vaccination.org.uk/a/loat1.html]
 
*[[1951]] The Truth About Vaccination and Immunization by Lily Loat [http://www.vaccination.org.uk/a/loat1.html]
*[[1957]] THE POISONED NEEDLE by Eleanor McBean [http://www.vaccination.org.uk/a/mcbean6.html]
+
*[[1957]] The Poisoned Needle by Eleanor McBean [http://www.vaccination.org.uk/a/mcbean6.html]
*[[1990]] UNIVERSAL IMMUNIZATION Medical Miracle or Masterful Mirage By Dr. Raymond Obomsawin [http://www.vaccination.org.uk/a/obomsawin3.html]
+
*[[1990]] Universal Immunization Medical Miracle or Masterful Mirage By Dr. Raymond Obomsawin [http://www.vaccination.org.uk/a/obomsawin3.html]
  
 
==Anti-Vaccinationist Assertions==
 
==Anti-Vaccinationist Assertions==
It is difficult to resolve the many assertions made by various websites and individuals identifiably of the anti-vaccinationist fraternity, into a nesting set of propositions such that any individual one depends on any other. Multiplication and divergence are characteristic of the method of argument employed, rather than classification and consolidation.  See [[Anti-vaccinationist/Assertion table]] for an incomplete list.
+
It is difficult to resolve the many assertions made by various websites and individuals identifiably opposed to vaccines, as objections are many and vary from individual to individual and from group to group. Multiplication and divergence are characteristic of the method of argument employed, rather than classification and consolidation.
  
(See also [[Vaccine_controversy]])
+
==== In on-line engagements ====
  
==== In on-line responses, fora and WP ====
+
Responses to papers or reports of scientific or political enquiry attract responses from a small population of frequent responders. Proponents of vaccination dismiss criticism as ignorant and frivolous.
  
Responses to papers or reports of scientific or political enquiry in the [[BMJ]] attract responses deploying arguments of the usual types and in the usual fashion from a small population of frequent responders.  It is characteristic of the anti-vacciantionist arguemnt, as distinct from an argument on knowledge or science, that the same arguments are brought forward repeatedly despite having been refuted.  The purpose is not to determine fact, but to persuade people into action.  This is exemplified in the massive duplication of identical material, rather than placing a single copy in one place, maintaining it well, and pointing to it.
+
== Objections on a broad front ==
 
+
Many objections are raised, not apparently on vaccination itself, but on some individual component of a vaccine or of the social arrangements around it. They appear from the association of the people involved to be anti-vaccination activity, rather than as may be asserted, an effort to improve the safety of vaccines. Where overlaps with other groups who oppose the use of some technique can be found, the objections are voiced more strongly.
On WP similar behaviour is demonstrated, as can be seen in the history of various articles, for instance [[Mumps]].
+
 
+
== Attacks on a broad front ==
+
Many attacks are made, not apparently on vaccination itself, but on some individual component of a vaccine or of the social arrangements around it. They appear from the association of the people involved to be anti-vaccinationist activity, rather than as may be asserted, an effort to improve the safety of vaccines. If an overlap with another group who have an interest in discrediting the use of some technique can be found, the tactic seems likely to generate even more activity.
+
  
 
===Science===
 
===Science===
Line 182: Line 88:
  
 
===Cell-lines===
 
===Cell-lines===
A reluctance to use (viral) vaccines derived from human cell-lines is a definite principled objection. Secular ethical, humanist and mainstream religious views generally do not reject them. The element of presentation of the argument, in terms of absolutes and the evil of those preparing the vaccines distinguishes arguments from an anti-vaccinationist stance from the disucssion of proportionate benefit and harm in a continuum of ethics.
+
A reluctance to use (viral) vaccines derived from human cell-lines is one objection. Secular ethical, humanist and mainstream religious views generally do not reject them. The element of presentation of the argument, in terms of absolutes and the evil of those preparing the vaccines, distinguishes arguments from an anti-vaccinationist stance from the disucssion of proportionate benefit and harm in a continuum of ethics.
 
+
=== Thimerosal ===
+
{{main|Thimerosal controversy}}, for chemical properties, see [[thimerosal]]''
+
 
+
Thimerosal is being phased out (already in some European countries) and the U.S. is following.
+
 
+
Recently, largely in the United States, it has been suggested that the organic [[mercury]] content of thimerosal in childhood vaccines could contribute to [[autism]]. The 2004 [[Institute of Medicine]] panel favoured rejecting any causal relationship between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism. The interests in this are vested, for example, governments wishing public health policies to proceed, pharmaceutical companies preferring not to pay huge damages, and (in the absence of no-fault compensation) large monetary gains for successful litigants and their counsel.
+
 
+
 
+
Anti-vaccination sites present information on the assertions of danger more prominently than these findings or the fact that thimerosal is absent from most vaccines.
+
 
+
==See also==
+
  
 
==Anti-vaccine websites==
 
==Anti-vaccine websites==
Line 201: Line 95:
 
*[http://www.avn.org.au AVN (Australia)]
 
*[http://www.avn.org.au AVN (Australia)]
 
*[http://www.vaclib.org/index.htm Vaccination Liberation (USA)]
 
*[http://www.vaclib.org/index.htm Vaccination Liberation (USA)]
 
+
*[http://www.jabs.org.uk Justice Awareness and Basic Support (UK)]
=== Websites commenting upon them ===
+
*[http://www.909shot.com National Vaccine Information Center (USA)]
* [http://www.quackwatch.com Quackwatch]
+
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
* Wolfe RM, Sharp LK. Anti-vaccinationists past and present. ''[[British Medical Journal|BMJ]] 2002;325:430-2. [http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/325/7361/430 Fulltext]. PMID 12193361.
 
* Wolfe RM, Sharp LK. Anti-vaccinationists past and present. ''[[British Medical Journal|BMJ]] 2002;325:430-2. [http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/325/7361/430 Fulltext]. PMID 12193361.
 
*[http://www.pathguy.com/antiimmu.htm The Anti-Immunization Activists: A Pattern of Deception] - Ed Friedlander, MD
 
*[http://www.pathguy.com/antiimmu.htm The Anti-Immunization Activists: A Pattern of Deception] - Ed Friedlander, MD
 
{{wikipedia|Anti-vaccinationists}}
 
  
 
[[Category:Medicine]]
 
[[Category:Medicine]]
 
[[Category:Activism]]
 
[[Category:Activism]]

Latest revision as of 03:22, 5 September 2010

Anti-vaccinationism is a term used to describe those who, for various reasons, oppose vaccination. Since the process of vaccination has become a standard part of public health and medicine, there have been groups and individuals who opposed vaccinationions.

Brief history[edit]

Efforts by individuals and communities to avoid death of infectious diseases have been recorded since at least Hippocrates, as have disagreements on their detail. Modern states assert an interest in and a right to control aspects of these efforts.

Widespread vaccination began in the UK, in the early 1800s, after Edward Jenner. It succeeded variolation.

At first the government encouraged vaccination.

Compulsion[edit]

In the UK, traditionally neither particularly paternalistic and authoritarian, nor particularly laissez-faire, successive Vaccination Acts from 1840 made vaccination compulsory and banned variolation as being less effective and more hazardous than vaccination.

This represented a significant change in the relationship between state and subject.

Backlash[edit]

A prompt backlash occurred, initially focused on compulsion, which after a time settled on arguments that the vaccine was dangerous or ineffective. After that argument was won, compulsion ceasing and large-scale vaccination having been conducted, arguments on the latter grounds continued to be presented. Some of them derive from a view of the world which rejects the germ theory of Pasteur, and advances as true theories which have been discarded by most scientists active in the relevant fields.

In the United States, smallpox outbreaks had become contained by the latter half of the 19th century. Vaccination had been widespread in the early part the century, and before that smallpox had been widespread. Vaccination then fell into disuse. In the 1870s the disease became epidemic, the population therefore being demonstrated to be susceptible.

Anti-vaccination activity also increased in the United States in the latter part of the 19th century. In 1879, after a visit to New York by William Tebb, a British citizen opposed to vaccination, the Anti-Vaccination Society of America was founded. Subsequently, the New England Anti-Compulsory Vaccination League was formed in 1882 and the Anti-Vaccination League of New York City in 1885.

Initial arguments[edit]

Arguments against compulsion gained considerable support. In the UK and abroad, when vaccination was introduced there are reports of individual clergymen supporting objections to it. Since the same applied to the potato, it is not clear that there was a special religious angle.

Prior to Pasteur's work there had been several clear assertions that contagion spread from person to person. Prior to the availability of microscopes the nature of that contagion - microbes - could not be elucidated. After that time, and as demonstrated by Semmelweiss, Lister and others, the knowledge that there were specific modes of cross-infection and that there were means to avoid them diffused through the population, though other safety concerns surrounding specific vaccines do exist, particularly the live-agent vaccines and "preserved" vaccines which contain potentially toxic compounds.




The People[edit]

Organisations wholly or largely existing to oppose immunisation[edit]

Historical[edit]

The initial aims and results of the early movements:- In the UK vaccination was provided free and Variolation outlawed from 1840 under the Vaccination Act. Widespread or organised resistance or protest is not reported at that time.

1873 Act: In 1873 a further Vaccination Act made vaccination compulsory. Records of the reasoning for this are not widely available. However it is apparent that soon after this there was considerable resistance to the compulsion, and this grew. In 1885 a Royal Commission sat, following riots in Leicester and reported 7 years later, recommending the abolition of cumulative penalties. A new Vaccination Act in 1898 removed cumulative penalties and introduced a conscience clause, allowing parents who did not believe vaccination was efficacious or safe to obtain a certificate of exemption. This act extended the important concept of the "conscientious objector" in English law.

The aims of the protesters and organisations had thus been achieved in 1898.

Current[edit]

Since the reversion from compulsory immunisation in the UK, opposition has continued, albeit at a low level and with the termination of the national organisations set up to oppose compulsion.

This opposition could no longer focus upon the abridgement of vicarious individual liberty - the right to determine what is done to one's children - and adopted the arguments that immunisation did not have an effect; that it had an effect but the effect was overwhelmingly bad; or that although immunisation had a beneficial effect that beneficial effect was less than lifelong and produced perverse consequences.

This was a change of ground and toward hypotheses that in theory require evidence and are susceptible to disproof rather than the philosophical questions of the relationship of individuals to state or deity. Accordingly, scientific investigation has been undertaken, and also accordingly subsidiary arguments essentially consisting of the serial assertion that each scientific investigation which did not prove one of those hypotheses had been incorrectly designed, conducted, interpreted or punctuated and spelled.

The State[edit]

"Vaccination is unique among de facto mandatory requirements in the modern era, requiring individuals to accept the injection of a medicine or medicinal agent into their bodies, and it has provoked a spirited opposition. This opposition began with the first vaccinations, has not ceased, and probably never will. From this realisation arises a difficult issue: how should the mainstream medical authorities approach the anti-vaccination movement? A passive reaction could be construed as endangering the health of society, whereas a heavy handed approach can threaten the values of individual liberty and freedom of expression that we cherish." BMJ

Some of the United States in America make no requirement for immunisation, but a legislative requirement for immunisation before admission to school, and another for schooling. An overlap between followers of contemporary anti-vaccinationists and home-schoolers must arise from this.

Anti-Vaccinists quotes[edit]

  • "The greatest threat of childhood diseases lies in the dangerous and ineffectual efforts made to prevent them through mass immunization.....There is no convincing scientific evidence that mass inoculations can be credited with eliminating any childhood disease."--Dr Robert Mendelsohn, M.D (Ref: How To Raise Your Child In Spite Of Your Doctor)
  • "I found that the whole vaccine business was indeed a gigantic hoax. Most doctors are convinced that they are useful, but if you look at the proper statistics and study the instances of these diseases you will realize that this is not so."--Dr Archie Kalokerinos MD (Interview---- International Vaccine Newsletter June 1995 [1])
  • "The 'victory over epidemics' was not won by medical science or by doctors--and certainly not by vaccines.....the decline...has been the result of technical, social and hygienic improvements and especially of improved nutrition.....the claim that vaccinations are the cause for the decline of infectious diseases is utter nonsense."--Dr. med. Gerhard Buchwald (Ref: The Vaccination Nonsense. ISBN 3-8334-2508-3 page 108.)

Publications[edit]

  • 1884 Compulsory Vaccination in England by William Tebb [2]
  • 1898 Vaccination A Delusion by Alfred Russel Wallace [3]
  • 1936 The Case Against Vaccination By M. Beddow Bayly M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P. [4]
  • 1951 The Truth About Vaccination and Immunization by Lily Loat [5]
  • 1957 The Poisoned Needle by Eleanor McBean [6]
  • 1990 Universal Immunization Medical Miracle or Masterful Mirage By Dr. Raymond Obomsawin [7]

Anti-Vaccinationist Assertions[edit]

It is difficult to resolve the many assertions made by various websites and individuals identifiably opposed to vaccines, as objections are many and vary from individual to individual and from group to group. Multiplication and divergence are characteristic of the method of argument employed, rather than classification and consolidation.

In on-line engagements[edit]

Responses to papers or reports of scientific or political enquiry attract responses from a small population of frequent responders. Proponents of vaccination dismiss criticism as ignorant and frivolous.

Objections on a broad front[edit]

Many objections are raised, not apparently on vaccination itself, but on some individual component of a vaccine or of the social arrangements around it. They appear from the association of the people involved to be anti-vaccination activity, rather than as may be asserted, an effort to improve the safety of vaccines. Where overlaps with other groups who oppose the use of some technique can be found, the objections are voiced more strongly.

Science[edit]

Assertions that immunisation cannot work because the theory on which it works is incorrect have been made.

Cell-lines[edit]

A reluctance to use (viral) vaccines derived from human cell-lines is one objection. Secular ethical, humanist and mainstream religious views generally do not reject them. The element of presentation of the argument, in terms of absolutes and the evil of those preparing the vaccines, distinguishes arguments from an anti-vaccinationist stance from the disucssion of proportionate benefit and harm in a continuum of ethics.

Anti-vaccine websites[edit]

References[edit]