Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
comparison between DSDM and XP testing
From Anarchopedia
Revision as of 09:29, 20 November 2008 by Rev 22 (Talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by 64.247.69.74 (Talk) to last version by Beta M)
This article will compare and contrast DSDM and XP software testing.
DSDM
Principles (J Stapleton, DSDM business focused development, 2nd ed. 2003): 4. Fitness for business purpose is the essential criterion for acceptance of deliverables. 8. Testing is integrated throughout the lifecycle.
- Unit tests are prioritised in accordance with Risk Based Testing.
- Testing is done at the end of each phase/iteration. (see: DSDM lifecycle)
XP
- Fully integrated testing.
- Continuous integration.
- Write test first, code to pass the test.
- Extreme programming achieves 100% code coverage through coding only to pass the tests.
Simmilarities
In both frameworks:
- Tests are repeatable.
- Customer validation is the key
