Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "violence and non-violence"
(from meta) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Other Non-Violent anarchists advocate [[Marshall Rosenberg]]'s | Other Non-Violent anarchists advocate [[Marshall Rosenberg]]'s | ||
| − | + | {{afaq}} | |
| − | + | {{wikipedia}} | |
Revision as of 14:53, 6 December 2005
Anarchists have often been portrayed as dangerous and violent, due mainly to a number of high-profile violent acts including riots, assassinations, and insurrections involving anarchists. Since the 1970s, the punk image of irresponsible youths has also been associated with anarchist symbolism, so furthering the association with violence.
The use of terrorism and assassination, however, is condemned by most anarchist ideology, though there remains no consensus on the legitimacy or utility of violence.
Some anarchists share Leo Tolstoy's Christian anarchist belief in non-violence. These anarcho-pacifists advocate non-violent resistance as the only method of achieving a truly anarchist revolution. They often see violence as the basis of government and coercion and argue that, as such, violence is illegitimate, no matter who is the target. Some of Proudhon's French followers even saw strike action as coercive and refused to take part in such traditional socialist tactics.
Other Non-Violent anarchists advocate Marshall Rosenberg's
| This article incorporates text from An Anarchist FAQ [1] | @-faq |
| This article contains content from Wikipedia. Current versions of the GNU FDL article violence and non-violence on WP may contain information useful to the improvement of this article | WP |
