Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Complacency is insanity"
From Anarchopedia
(→Latin grammar: new section) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC) | :If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Latin grammar == | ||
| + | |||
| + | So, Mr Insanity, just why ''did'' you stop thinking the grammar of dead languages is junk knowledge? | ||
Revision as of 23:46, 27 January 2011
Full protection of every single page that you edit or create with no expiry set against an easily revertible vandal is a little over the top for this site.
- If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. Complacency is insanity 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Latin grammar
So, Mr Insanity, just why did you stop thinking the grammar of dead languages is junk knowledge?
