Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Shell to Sea"
(→Attempted smears) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Guards force digger through crowd.jpg|thumb|right|300px|The "no-arrest policy in action; members of [[An Garda SÃochána]] and residents of [[Glengad]] and [[Barnacullew]] dispute ownership of a road, Glengad, June 2007. The Gardaà eventually conceded the road was not public and have not gone near it since]] | [[Image:Guards force digger through crowd.jpg|thumb|right|300px|The "no-arrest policy in action; members of [[An Garda SÃochána]] and residents of [[Glengad]] and [[Barnacullew]] dispute ownership of a road, Glengad, June 2007. The Gardaà eventually conceded the road was not public and have not gone near it since]] | ||
− | '''Shell to Sea''' (in [[Irish language|Irish]], ''Shell chun Sáile'') is a campaign based in [[County Mayo]], [[Ireland]] which opposed the proposed construction of a high-pressure raw [[natural gas|gas]] [[gas pipeline|pipeline]] through [[Rossport]], and continues to oppose the ongoing construction by [[Royal Dutch Shell]] of a refinery at [[Bellanaboy]] intended to refine the untreated gas from the [[Corrib gas field]]. The stated aim of the campaign is that the gas be refined at sea, | + | '''Shell to Sea''' (in [[Irish language|Irish]], ''Shell chun Sáile'') is a campaign based in [[County Mayo]], [[Ireland]] which opposed the proposed construction of a high-pressure raw [[natural gas|gas]] [[gas pipeline|pipeline]] through [[Rossport]], and continues to oppose the ongoing construction by [[Royal Dutch Shell]] of a refinery at [[Bellanaboy]] intended to refine the untreated gas from the [[Corrib gas field]]. The stated aim of the campaign is that the gas be refined at sea (hence the name), thereby making it safer to transport, before it is brought ashore and past people's houses. In their own words: |
− | + | ''"Shell to Sea is an international [[Nonviolence|non-violent]] campaign, rooted in the [[Erris]] community. We seek to ensure the proposed Corrib gas [[Refinery|terminal]] and pipeline are constructed offshore, as is best practice. In doing so we seek to highlight the negligent [[Social environment|environmental]], [[health]], safety, planning and economic consequences of this [[Irish government|government]]-backed plan. We are not the property of any party or movement and we disassociate ourselves from negative campaigning and tactics that many media outlets have attempted to associate us with. We have been campaigning for several years and continue to face [[intimidation]], [[slander]] and significant hardship as a result. However, we are growing in strength, numbers and confidence. We will remain peaceful, committed and determined in the coming days, weeks months - and years if necessary!"'' [http://www.corribsos.com/index.php?id=2&type=page] | |
+ | |||
+ | The most recent poll on the issue ([[January 2008]]) showed Shell to Sea's stance is supported by three times as many people in Mayo as those who support Shell. [http://www.mayoadvertiser.com/index.php?aid=18] This is similar to national trends. | ||
==Background== | ==Background== |
Revision as of 11:50, 15 January 2009
Shell to Sea (in Irish, Shell chun Sáile) is a campaign based in County Mayo, Ireland which opposed the proposed construction of a high-pressure raw gas pipeline through Rossport, and continues to oppose the ongoing construction by Royal Dutch Shell of a refinery at Bellanaboy intended to refine the untreated gas from the Corrib gas field. The stated aim of the campaign is that the gas be refined at sea (hence the name), thereby making it safer to transport, before it is brought ashore and past people's houses. In their own words:
"Shell to Sea is an international non-violent campaign, rooted in the Erris community. We seek to ensure the proposed Corrib gas terminal and pipeline are constructed offshore, as is best practice. In doing so we seek to highlight the negligent environmental, health, safety, planning and economic consequences of this government-backed plan. We are not the property of any party or movement and we disassociate ourselves from negative campaigning and tactics that many media outlets have attempted to associate us with. We have been campaigning for several years and continue to face intimidation, slander and significant hardship as a result. However, we are growing in strength, numbers and confidence. We will remain peaceful, committed and determined in the coming days, weeks months - and years if necessary!" [1]
The most recent poll on the issue (January 2008) showed Shell to Sea's stance is supported by three times as many people in Mayo as those who support Shell. [2] This is similar to national trends.
Contents
Background
Opposition to the gas consortium and government's plans among local residents grew during 2000, when some people felt they were not being given adequate answers to questions they had about a refinery and raw gas pipeline intended for their area[1]. A Channel Four documentary stated that "huge pressure" had been exerted on Mayo County Council's planning office to grant permission for the inland refinery. Due to a loophole in Irish law, no planning permission was necessary for the pipeline. The council duly granted permission, a decision that was immediately appealed to An Bord Pleanála (ABP) by local people and environmental groups.
After holding two hearings, one being the norm, and producing a report on the refinery proposition, ABP refused permission in 2002. Setting another precedent, this decision was reversed in 2003 after political pressure from the Fianna Fáil government [2] (see Corrib gas controversy).
Local landowners [3] in Rossport were told that the raw gas pipeline would be coming through their lands. They would be subject to Compulsory Acqusition Orders if unable to reach a deal with Shell [4]. SomeTemplate:who agreed to allow Shell on their lands. Others refused, and Frank Fahey, then Minister for the Marine & Natural Resources signed 34 Compulsory Acquisition Orders. Those who had refused were threatened with legal action. Legal action was eventually brought against four landowning farmers and their former teacher who had joined them in blocking Shell workers coming on their lands, and lived in nearby Ceathrú Thaidhg. BrÃd McGarry, who had also blocked Shell workers from her lands, was not brought to court. Mary Corduff is quoted in Our Story:The Rossport Five as having seen an internal Shell memo to the effect that McGarry was not to be brought to court because of her gender. The five men were sentenced to jail indefinitely after refusing to promise to allow Shell put the pipeline through. They became known as the Rossport Five.
24-hour pickets on the Shell sites at Rossport, Bellanaboy and Glengad began after their jailing[unverified], and remained for fifteen months. Rallies in support of the men's stance were held in major towns and cities, and Shell and Statoil filling stations were picketed [5].
Motivation
The campaign has a diverse support base, including people from many different political backgrounds and those with no strong politics at all. Werner Blau, a physics professor at Trinity College, Dublin, and part-time Rossport resident, told his neighbours that the pipeline intended for Rossport would not even comply with United States standards which were "pretty lax"[6]. In its rankings of countries' facilitation of oil and gas companies, the World Bank rates Ireland in its highest, "very favourable" category, along with Pakistan and Argentina. By comparison, Nigeria is rated average. Mike Cunningham, a former director of Statoil, said: "No country in the world gives as favourable terms to the oil companies as Ireland." This is a result of legislation created by Ray Burke, who served as Minister of Communications and Energy.[3]
Many Irish people from outside Erris are concerned about aspects of the proposed project beyond the injustice visited on the Rossport Five and the health and safety fears of Erris residents. These include allowing private companies to acquire property without the permission of the owners and what many regard as the amazingly generous terms given to the oil companies by successive Fianna Fáil governments [7].
People from the Niger Delta now resident in Ireland have been especially interested and supportive of the campaign, having had first-hand experience of living in an area that Shell has been active in, and many have visited the area to show support for the campaign [8]. A mural of Ken Saro-Wiwa, who was executed after leading a campaign to reduce Shell's influence in Ogoniland, has been painted on a gable in Rossport.
The suspicions of many that Shell were bribing influential Erris people for support were strengthened when former Irish Air Corps pilot and owner of an adventure centre in Elly Bay on the Mullet peninsula, Ciarán Ó Murchú told a rally at Bellanaboy in October 2006 that Shell E&P Ireland tried to "buy his support" with an offer of €15,000 for a climbing wall in 2005. He said that company officials promised him that no one would know that the money came from Shell if he accepted it. He rejected the offer, which he said was very tempting, but believes that other businesses have experienced similar approaches. [9]
Attempted smears
It has often been claimed that the IRA or Sinn Féin have an element of control over the Shell to Sea campaign. This story has been encouraged by the former Minister for Justice Michael McDowell, various national newspapers and local businessmen[unverified]. Members of many different political groups are involved in the campaign, and prominent local Sinn Féin member Paddy Ruddy works for Shell. Most local campaigners are former Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael supporters, and Philip McGrath, one of the Rossport Five, used to be an election agent for Fine Gael leader Enda Kenny.
Before this, members of the campaign were caricatured as tree-hugging hippies and "sub-intellectual" peasants[unverified]. Stories of intimidation of project supporters have also been rife, but these have been rubbished by local Fine Gael TD Michael Ring. Ring was originally a staunch supporter of Shell to Sea until but now opposes their actions[10]. Allegations of intimidation were also made by the GardaÃ, though there have been no arrests made or individuals questioned. Pro-Shell businessman and president of Belmullet chamber of commerce Derek Reilly told the media that what is being described as "intimidation" is actually boycotting of pro-Shell businesses by Shell to Sea supporters. He told the Irish Times: "It has never been anything more serious than that, but that is serious enough."[11]
Current Situation
The Rossport Five were released in late 2005. Peter Cassells was appointed as a negotiator to arbitrate between the campaigners and Shell. As his remit did not include discussing the refinery, he was regarded as a distraction by Shell to Sea. The pickets at Bellanaboy continued for over a year, during which no work was done by Shell.
On Tuesday September 26 2006, protesters prevented Shell's employees from entering the site of the intended refinery at Bellanaboy to begin work. Around 150 locals and protesters blocked the entrance to the refinery site and began to recite the rosary. The workers turned back after discussions with GardaÃ.[unverified]
One week later on the 3rd of October, scores more Gardaà were brought in from around the country, which increased their numbers to around 170. The Gardaà beat protesters away from the site gates and on to, then off, the roads near Bellanaboy for the first time. This marked a departure in Garda tactics which they have held to. The Irish Times reported: "The Garda baton charges that occurred on Friday morning in Bellanaboy were not the product of Sinn Féin or Provisional IRA machinations; they were the product of abject Government incompetence." [12] A government decision to avoid arresting protesters in order to damp down the negative publicity that would ensue was discussed in the police force's magazine, Garda Review. An attempt was made to block workers' access to the site by lying on the road but protesters were dragged off the road, thrown over fences and into ditches by the GardaÃ. A number of people were injured and one young woman was brought to hospital.[13]</br>
With the daily protests at Bellanaboy continuing, protesters occupied Shell Ireland HQ on Dublin's Leeson Street.[14]</br>
On the October 12, three people were arrested at the morning protests.[15]
On Friday October 20th there was a large scale protest at Bellanaboy, and one protester was arrested and released without charge. [16]
During the following weeks, incidents of Garda brutality in policing the daily protests became more frequent [4]. This was a result of Belmullet Superintendent Joe Gannon's publicly stated policy of avoiding arresting protestors so as not to create "martyrs", leaving those under his command no option but physical force, which made some violence inevitable.
A second large scale protest march was planned for November 10, the anniversary of the execution of Ken Saro Wiwa and eight other anti-Shell activists in Nigeria in 1995. When protesters worked their way around Gardaà lines, clashes occurred, resulting in many injuries and several hospitalisations. Small groups of demonstrators who had been unable to get to the refinery attempted to blockade the nearby Lennon's quarry which supplies material for the construction of the site. [17]
There was political controversy in Ireland about the use of such force on a peaceful demonstration. The Fianna Fáil Taoiseach Bertie Ahern said in a statement that the Irish government's position was clear in relation to the Corrib gas situation - that the negotiating is over and "that is it". In relation to the policing of the protests, he and Opposition leader Enda Kenny would only reiterate that "the law must be obeyed".
A further large scale protest at Bellanaboy scheduled for November 24 was cancelled by the protesters for fear of increased Garda belligerence that would have resulted in serious injury.
2007
On June 5, five protestors chained themselves together outside the Bord na Móna facility in Srahmore near Bangor Erris where Shell have being dumping the peat removed from Bellinaboy. While Gardaà awaited the arrival of the fire brigade to cut through the protestors' sophisticated "lock-on", a superintendent allegedly called a female protester a "cunt"[unverified].
On September 12, a protester from Dublin charged with public order offences has his case dismissed in Belmullet because of conflicting Garda evidence. On September 13, Judge Mary Devins likened the protest to Tiananmen Square in 1989, and demonstrations in Dublin by groups of farmers and taxi drivers, while delivering a verdict on the protesters who had chained themselves together in June. She dismissed most of the charges and sentenced the five to community service for "reckless behavior". The judge also disclosed that she had been receiving letters about the campaign and the cases before her, some sent anonymously. [18]</br>
2008
In April 2008, a new group was set up by people formerly active in Shell to Sea. Pobal Chill Chomáin proposed moving the refinery to Glinsk, which would have removed the necessity to transport the raw untreated gas near people's homes and under roads, and also saved Shell the extra cost of refining offshore. The proposal was rejected by Shell[unverified].
In August 2008, Shell to Sea began training for marine protests in anticipation of the arrival of the Allseas pipe-laying ship Solitaire, the biggest of its kind in the world. The Shell to Sea fleet was composed mostly of inflatable dinghies and kayaks, but also included a small sailboat, a currach, and two rigid-hulled inflatable boats, one of which was used purely as a safety boat. All were named after historical figures, and blessed by parish priest Fr. Nallen at Glengad pier in early September.
In the meantime, a local Porturlin fisherman laid 800 crab pots along the intended path of the Solitaire, and defended them from Shell survey boats which attempted to remove them. Two Irish Navy ships arrived in Broadhaven Bay to assist the Garda Water Unit in dealing with the protests. The Solitaire was boarded by Shell to Sea activists in Killybegs and told not to come to Mayo. Not long after it arrived to Mayo's coast, the ship was buzzed by trawlers, the crews of which were repeatedly arrested by Gardaà until their solicitor raised Article 40 of the Irish Constitution. That night the Solitaire suffered damage to its back crane, which it said was due to heavy seas. It returned to Donegal, and has since gone to the Clyde for repairs.
On September 15, a crude improvised explosive device was found outside the Dublin HQ of Shell Ireland [19]. Shell were quick to condemn what they referred to as a "sinister escalation" of the campaign against them.
Hunger strike
On the September 9 2008, Shell to Sea campaigner Maura Harrington began a hunger strike to coincide with the arrival of the Solitaire, the Allseas pipe-laying vessel, in Broadhaven Bay. Harrington is the principal of Inver Primary School, by Broadhaven Bay [20]. She ended her protest on September 19, after the ship was damaged and had to leave Ireland for repairs, criticising protesters who were willing to compromise in the process[21].
References
- ↑ Our Story:The Rossport Five
- ↑ http://www.publicinquiry.ie/pdf/Fiosru_2_HI_RES_Final.pdf
- ↑ Our Story:The Rossport Five
- ↑ http://www.publicinquiry.ie/pdf/Fiosru_2_HI_RES_Final.pdf
- ↑ http://www.anphoblacht.com/news/detail/10589
- ↑ http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1530695,00.html
- ↑ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/24/AR2005092401403.html
- ↑ https://www.indymedia.ie/article/72983?userlanguage=ga&save_prefs=true
- ↑ http://www.corribsos.com/index.php?id=1105
- ↑ Irish Independent 21st October 2006
- ↑ http://www.corribsos.com/index.php?id=1105
- ↑ http://www.corribsos.com/index.php?id=1105
- ↑ "Mayo News" article 3rd October 2006
- ↑ RTE news report 11th October
- ↑ RTE news report 12th October 2006
- ↑ RTÉ NEWS OCTOBER 20TH 2006
- ↑ RTE News November 10th
- ↑ "Western People" article 20th September 2007
- ↑ http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2008/0916/1221430255966.html
- ↑ http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2008/0910/breaking8.html?via=mr
- ↑ http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2008/0920/1221835126751.html
See also
- Controversies surrounding Royal Dutch Shell
- Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People
- Rossport Five
- Rossport Solidarity Camp
- Royal Dutch Shell safety concerns