Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Murray Rothbard"
From Anarchopedia
m |
Joel.davis (Talk | contribs) (debating in a dead discussion) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Can this article be either expanded or at least confirmed by somebody? ~ [[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA! V Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit§ion=new}} Talk]</sup></span> [[2007]] [[May 16]] 22:59 <sub>([[Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]])</sub> | Can this article be either expanded or at least confirmed by somebody? ~ [[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA! V Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit§ion=new}} Talk]</sup></span> [[2007]] [[May 16]] 22:59 <sub>([[Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]])</sub> | ||
:This guy is an "anarcho"-capitalist. He's not an anarchist. I'm not active on this Anarchopedia, but this article has nothing to do here, this is capitalist propaganda.--[[User:Sins We Can't Absolve|Sins We Can't Absolve]] 23:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC) | :This guy is an "anarcho"-capitalist. He's not an anarchist. I'm not active on this Anarchopedia, but this article has nothing to do here, this is capitalist propaganda.--[[User:Sins We Can't Absolve|Sins We Can't Absolve]] 23:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ~ [[User:joel.davis]] Whether or not he is what one would consider an anarchist is irrelevant to whether or not it may be important to those who are to be informed of his existence. Include counterarguments in the articles, he is still in the anarchist universe though. | ||
Revision as of 05:59, 23 December 2007
Is that so?
Can this article be either expanded or at least confirmed by somebody? ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) 2007 May 16 22:59 (UTC)
- This guy is an "anarcho"-capitalist. He's not an anarchist. I'm not active on this Anarchopedia, but this article has nothing to do here, this is capitalist propaganda.--Sins We Can't Absolve 23:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
~ User:joel.davis Whether or not he is what one would consider an anarchist is irrelevant to whether or not it may be important to those who are to be informed of his existence. Include counterarguments in the articles, he is still in the anarchist universe though.
