Difference between revisions of "Template talk:wikipedia"

Revision as of 01:44, 13 March 2007

Deleting thist template

delete this! why? wikipedia everytime deleted source:anarchopedia

enough reason?

wikipedia fight against us and we make promotion for this project ???

That is true, I have never seen Wikipedia source other GFDL projects in the article itself.

For them i think it is sufficient to mention the source (1) in the article history or (2) in the talk page of the article.

Perhaps we could do the same on Anarchopedia? ~Rev 22 19:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I would like to disagree with that. 1: There is no reason to copy the behaviour of Wikipedia, if they disrespect the whole Free License community we do not have to jump on board. 2: Wikipedia is not the only refference template that exists, other templates are out there also, i believe they serve as useful tools of building up the community on the Internet. 3: I think if somebody is doing a research on the subject we must make it as easy for them as possible. And ok, you might say, nobody will use Anarchopedia as the source for the PhD paper, but somebody might if they are writing for a magazine or an online resource. Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) ^Talk 21:34

Your arguments make sense, maybe the reference template can be moved to the talk page once the article on Anarchopedia is substantially rewritten. ~Rev 22 21:43, 3 May 2006 (UTC)