|
|
| (220 intermediate revisions by 92 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | With old rewrite rules it was not possible to upload files. With new it is possible. You will see links like ".../index.php/some_page", but it is possible to type "http://deu.anarchopedia.org/some page" and your url will be rewritten to "http;//deu.anarchopedia.org/index.php/some_page". When we would have some faster machines or some better MediaWiki code, we would have "nice urls", too. --[[User:millosh|millosh]] 05:32, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
| + | Why's there so much conspiracy nonsense on the main page? Especially because it's so ill-informed, stupid (Boko Haram means Western education is sinful, why advertise Western education then huh huh, checkmate) and factually incorrect (BH was close to taking over the country, yeah right, they control like a small part of North-Eastern Nigeria). I'll remove it.[[User:Godoftheinternets|Godoftheinternets]] 11:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC) |
| − | | + | |
| − | i don't get the sense of the featured articel [[Anarchopedia:troll]]
| + | |
| − | this is vandalism, isn't it? --[[User:83.64.198.175|83.64.198.175]] 14:16, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Doesn't look like vandalism to me. No page history. Yet perhaps, a misunderstanding. --[[User:atotland|Anni]] 07:03, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Spammers ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Is anyone against implementation of SpamBlacklist extension with initial Wikimedia-CreativeCommons list? --[[User:Millosh|Milos Rancic]] 08:02, 26 May 2005 (CDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | If no one has anything against in the next seven days, I'll implement it on Meta. (I am asking all communities for that: i.e. people from Meta, [[:deu:]], [[:eng:]] and [[:fra:]]. I'll implement it on [http://hrv.anarchopedia.org/ hrv:]] because I don't think that my friend Marko has anything against it.) --[[User:Millosh|Milos Rancic]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Forum ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | (From Meta:) [[:fra:User:Blackat|Blackat]] from French Anarchopedia asked me to open forum. I didn't open under anarchopedia.org, but I opened one multilingual forum (phpBB2) on http://forum.anarhija.org/ . If anynone thinks that it is useful, please use it. --[[User:Millosh|Milos Rancic]] 08:22, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == "Anarchy," but registration required to contribute? ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | It seems like a gross contradiction in principle to require registration with a central database in order to contribute to a supposedly anarchic project. How can this possibly be justified? If the answer is "to avoid vandalism," isn't that massively hypocritical, given that that's the exact answer oligarchists and every other sort of pro-government political theorists would proffer to the question of why centralized government is necessary?
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Crypto-anarchists are having a good laugh at this project.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | :[[mediawiki]] sucks, as it requires a central database, but at the moment it is the state of the art for wiki sites. Requiring registration was a measure adopted to counter spam from scripts (I don't agree with it also, as it may discourage some contributors). [[User:rev 22|rev 22]] 22:19, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | :A few more things, for registering you are not required to provide your real name or an email. You can also use an account without an hidden password like [[User:a]] did (user name and password are the same). Using IPs doesn't provide real anonymity. [[User:rev 22|rev 22]] 01:14, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC) | + | |
Why's there so much conspiracy nonsense on the main page? Especially because it's so ill-informed, stupid (Boko Haram means Western education is sinful, why advertise Western education then huh huh, checkmate) and factually incorrect (BH was close to taking over the country, yeah right, they control like a small part of North-Eastern Nigeria). I'll remove it.Godoftheinternets 11:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
