Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:prostitution"
From Anarchopedia
m (→Only example) |
m (Talk:Prostitution moved to Talk:prostitution over redirect) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Only example== | ==Only example== | ||
| − | So when is prostitution selling self, but not in a sexual way? If i am a psychiatrist, i am selling my interaction with the person, and i am not a prostitute. {{ | + | So when is prostitution selling self, but not in a sexual way? If i am a psychiatrist, i am selling my interaction with the person, and i am not a prostitute. ~ [[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA! V Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit§ion=new}} Talk]</sup></span> |
:prostitution (lat. expose, offer themselves) - so wages-work in capitalism is everytime prostitution --[[User:X|X]] 16:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | :prostitution (lat. expose, offer themselves) - so wages-work in capitalism is everytime prostitution --[[User:X|X]] 16:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::The problem that i have with that definition is that what do you call selling sex then, "sex prostitution"? I think you are trying to use the word prostitution as a negative [[power word]]. While i do oppose [[wage slavery]] i don't think we must go down to this level to discredit it. In addition to that there are prostitutes who might find the fact that we are using the term in the negative way offensive in and of itself... now i'm not supporting [[political correctness]] either, but why go out of the way to be insulting? {{ | + | ::The problem that i have with that definition is that what do you call selling sex then, "sex prostitution"? I think you are trying to use the word prostitution as a negative [[power word]]. While i do oppose [[wage slavery]] i don't think we must go down to this level to discredit it. In addition to that there are prostitutes who might find the fact that we are using the term in the negative way offensive in and of itself... now i'm not supporting [[political correctness]] either, but why go out of the way to be insulting? ~ [[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA! V Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit§ion=new}} Talk]</sup></span> |
| − | ::Also, do you think there will be many people who will come to [[Anarchopedia]] and search for prostitution in hopes of finding an article about wage slavery... this is insulting to the readers. [[propaganda|Propaganda]] is good, but shouldn't be misleading. {{ | + | ::Also, do you think there will be many people who will come to [[Anarchopedia]] and search for prostitution in hopes of finding an article about wage slavery... this is insulting to the readers. [[propaganda|Propaganda]] is good, but shouldn't be misleading. ~ [[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA! V Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit§ion=new}} Talk]</sup></span> |
:::What is the mainly reason of selling sex by a (wo)man? You think it's fun? I think they people need the money... and by the way then we get this negative content, because this is the background and it corresponded with meaning of wage slavery. Why do you think that people come to anarchopedia to get informations in a common manner of limited content without background? --[[User:X|X]] 18:42, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | :::What is the mainly reason of selling sex by a (wo)man? You think it's fun? I think they people need the money... and by the way then we get this negative content, because this is the background and it corresponded with meaning of wage slavery. Why do you think that people come to anarchopedia to get informations in a common manner of limited content without background? --[[User:X|X]] 18:42, 3 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::But it's not the point of whether it is "for fun" or "for money" even if it is "for fun" it will be prostitution. But when it's not sex it's not. I don't understand your question "Why do you think [...]?" Here is another thing to think about, what if somebody comes to this page expecting to find information like this [http://www.swop.org.au/ 1], [http://www.iusw.org/ 2], or [http://www.bayswan.org/ 3]; and instead they find disinmormative propaganda putting prostitutes and other sex workers down... i'm not going to continue right now... just think about it. [[User:Beta_M|Beta_M]] (VolodyA! V Anarhist) <sup>[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit§ion=new}} Talk]</sup> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:06, 11 July 2008
Only example[edit]
So when is prostitution selling self, but not in a sexual way? If i am a psychiatrist, i am selling my interaction with the person, and i am not a prostitute. ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist)
- prostitution (lat. expose, offer themselves) - so wages-work in capitalism is everytime prostitution --X 16:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- The problem that i have with that definition is that what do you call selling sex then, "sex prostitution"? I think you are trying to use the word prostitution as a negative power word. While i do oppose wage slavery i don't think we must go down to this level to discredit it. In addition to that there are prostitutes who might find the fact that we are using the term in the negative way offensive in and of itself... now i'm not supporting political correctness either, but why go out of the way to be insulting? ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist)
- Also, do you think there will be many people who will come to Anarchopedia and search for prostitution in hopes of finding an article about wage slavery... this is insulting to the readers. Propaganda is good, but shouldn't be misleading. ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist)
- What is the mainly reason of selling sex by a (wo)man? You think it's fun? I think they people need the money... and by the way then we get this negative content, because this is the background and it corresponded with meaning of wage slavery. Why do you think that people come to anarchopedia to get informations in a common manner of limited content without background? --X 18:42, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- But it's not the point of whether it is "for fun" or "for money" even if it is "for fun" it will be prostitution. But when it's not sex it's not. I don't understand your question "Why do you think [...]?" Here is another thing to think about, what if somebody comes to this page expecting to find information like this 1, 2, or 3; and instead they find disinmormative propaganda putting prostitutes and other sex workers down... i'm not going to continue right now... just think about it. Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) Talk
