Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikipedia"
From Anarchopedia
(Undo revision 54652 by 188.163.31.19 (Talk)) |
|||
| (38 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Good question actually. I'm not sure. I assumed that it was because it said so in the refferences section, but i don't have any information beyond that. {{user:beta_m/sig}} | Good question actually. I'm not sure. I assumed that it was because it said so in the refferences section, but i don't have any information beyond that. {{user:beta_m/sig}} | ||
| − | :Perhaps you got confused by the fact that "Wikipedia" is in the title of the article? The references section had a link to an article at develop.consumerism.org. [[User: | + | :Perhaps you got confused by the fact that "Wikipedia" is in the title of the article? The references section had a link to an article at develop.consumerism.org. [[User:e★f|e★f]] 00:36, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | ==This is ''not'' [[vandalism]]== | ||
| + | Cool, I am editing "wikipedia"! [[User:YourLocalVandal|YourLocalVandal]] 14:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | *Good on ya mate for "not" vandalising. [[User:Mathmo|Mathmo]] 14:26, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==I've a question for those running this site.== | ||
| + | I have my own site critical of Wikipedia. It's: IHateWikipediaDOTcom. Is it something worth mentioning on this page? I've learned from Wikipedia to be cautious about mentioning it. [[User:12.214.202.204|12.214.202.204]] 17:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I looked at your site... must say it's nothing spectacular, but put it in. If there will be something terribly objectionable, then somebody can remove it. ~ [[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA! V Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit§ion=new}} Talk]</sup></span> [[2007]] [[May 24]] 18:33 <sub>([[Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]])</sub> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Funny? == | ||
| + | Bomis " ''pornography ring - [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/17/jimmy_wales_shot_dead_says_wikipedia/ Wikipedia founder 'shot by friend of Siegenthaler']'' ''The Register'' " removed by [[User:Anarchangel|Anarchangel]] 08:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:15, 4 September 2012
Contents
Was this Wikipedia article[edit]
Good question actually. I'm not sure. I assumed that it was because it said so in the refferences section, but i don't have any information beyond that. User:Beta m/sig
- Perhaps you got confused by the fact that "Wikipedia" is in the title of the article? The references section had a link to an article at develop.consumerism.org. e★f 00:36, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
This is not vandalism[edit]
Cool, I am editing "wikipedia"! YourLocalVandal 14:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Good on ya mate for "not" vandalising. Mathmo 14:26, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I've a question for those running this site.[edit]
I have my own site critical of Wikipedia. It's: IHateWikipediaDOTcom. Is it something worth mentioning on this page? I've learned from Wikipedia to be cautious about mentioning it. 12.214.202.204 17:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- I looked at your site... must say it's nothing spectacular, but put it in. If there will be something terribly objectionable, then somebody can remove it. ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) 2007 May 24 18:33 (UTC)
Funny?[edit]
Bomis " pornography ring - Wikipedia founder 'shot by friend of Siegenthaler' The Register " removed by Anarchangel 08:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
