Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikipedia sysop power structure"
From Anarchopedia
m (moving question from article) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*'' The admins are self-important and spiteful; they will edit out perfectly useful and accurate information because of 'guilt by association''. Perhaps! But what do you mean by "guilt by association"? Could someone give an example of information that would not apear on Wikipedia because of this guilt? (I'm not speaking rhetorically, just so you know.) | *'' The admins are self-important and spiteful; they will edit out perfectly useful and accurate information because of 'guilt by association''. Perhaps! But what do you mean by "guilt by association"? Could someone give an example of information that would not apear on Wikipedia because of this guilt? (I'm not speaking rhetorically, just so you know.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Example of guilt by association == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yeah, I just attempted one, that being the legitimate edits of a suspected sockpuppet being reverted by a sysop with unconditional backing of other sysops. [[User:TractorKing|TractorKing]] 11:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:46, 27 July 2008
- The admins are self-important and spiteful; they will edit out perfectly useful and accurate information because of 'guilt by association. Perhaps! But what do you mean by "guilt by association"? Could someone give an example of information that would not apear on Wikipedia because of this guilt? (I'm not speaking rhetorically, just so you know.)
Example of guilt by association[edit]
Yeah, I just attempted one, that being the legitimate edits of a suspected sockpuppet being reverted by a sysop with unconditional backing of other sysops. TractorKing 11:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
