Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Earth"
From Anarchopedia
(New section: Copying from wikipedia.) |
(→Copying from wikipedia.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Copying from wikipedia. == | == Copying from wikipedia. == | ||
| − | Wikipedia allows people to copy it, so I don't see what is wrong with doing so. | + | Wikipedia allows people to copy it, so I don't see what is wrong with doing so. {{unsigned|Zazaban}} |
| + | :I don't like it for the very harsh reason that people might think your community is to weak and pathetic to make content for yourselves. Also, can you take a look at the wikipedia copy? It is filled with a gazillion red links to pages that have 0-chance of being made. It also has a bunch of wiki code that will only work with mediawiki 2 billion. Sure, copying from WP might not result in such a messy page, but that's a big "might" that definitely does not apply on this article. --[[User:Elassint|Elassint]] 11:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:31, 28 June 2008
protected form linkspammers.--Fang 23 02:14, 2 june 2007 (UTC)
Copying from wikipedia.[edit]
Wikipedia allows people to copy it, so I don't see what is wrong with doing so. — Unsigned, by: Zazaban (Talk)
- I don't like it for the very harsh reason that people might think your community is to weak and pathetic to make content for yourselves. Also, can you take a look at the wikipedia copy? It is filled with a gazillion red links to pages that have 0-chance of being made. It also has a bunch of wiki code that will only work with mediawiki 2 billion. Sure, copying from WP might not result in such a messy page, but that's a big "might" that definitely does not apply on this article. --Elassint 11:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
