Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "YourGuideToFreedom/WorldTradeCenter"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(38 million USD prize for scientific explanation of WTC phenomena without MRR)
(let's not promote a particular search engine ;))
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
'''38 million USD prize for a scientific explanation of the WTC phenomena without MRR weapons. Tell your friends to harvest this "easy money"'''. In any case, while doing their investigation, they can learn a thing or two.
 
'''38 million USD prize for a scientific explanation of the WTC phenomena without MRR weapons. Tell your friends to harvest this "easy money"'''. In any case, while doing their investigation, they can learn a thing or two.
  
Line 79: Line 78:
 
Remember, 'pure' hydrogen bomb, so '''no uranium or plutonium at all'''. The basic nuclear reaction is Deuterium + Tritium Alpha + n.
 
Remember, 'pure' hydrogen bomb, so '''no uranium or plutonium at all'''. The basic nuclear reaction is Deuterium + Tritium Alpha + n.
  
google for
+
[[Search the Web]] for:
 
* hydrogen bomb wtc
 
* hydrogen bomb wtc
  
  
 
Back to [[YourGuideToFreedom]]
 
Back to [[YourGuideToFreedom]]

Revision as of 05:03, 30 January 2007

38 million USD prize for a scientific explanation of the WTC phenomena without MRR weapons. Tell your friends to harvest this "easy money". In any case, while doing their investigation, they can learn a thing or two.


To win the prize, you don't need to prove

  • that the progressive collapse is initiated under the given circumstances. NIST, the science contributor to the government's official conspiracy theory (911report.pdf coverup) made a computer model. Guess what: the building did not collapse. They cheated with the model until the collapse started. In fact the necessary cheat was so severe (remember the buildings' load-bearing designed for 6x stress, and most of the stress is not even gravity, but 200km/h wind)

However, to win the prize, you DO need to explain, with scientific reasoning

  • why and how the core of the towers turned to dust ?
  • how is it possible that the collapse was so quick (under 10 seconds) ?
    • what is the quickest progressive collapse that can be backed by a reasonable scientific model ?
  • what happened to the 1400 "vaporized" people ?
  • why do we only see average 13 or so small bone pieces (size of a few inch) of the other people who have not been completely vaporized ?
  • what happened to most of the furniture ?
  • what happened to the steel of the building ? How did most of the steel evaporate or turn to dust (some even visible on video), and the rest tangle up in a spaghetti or molten steel at the bottom ?
  • what force ejected pieces (often heavier than a hundred ton) across the street ?
  • where the energy pulverizing the concrete and expanding the pyroclastic cloud came from ?
  • if the main player was some kind of conventional explosive (such as thermate), what quantity was needed, placed how (in time and space) ?
  • how did the outer steel structure at the bottom survived, when the highest mass of the building rained on it, with the highest speed ? How is it possible that it mostly stayed standing, it didn't even lay down ?
  • how is it possible that it took 100 days of watering to put out the "fires" of the pool ?
  • why was it so urgent to ship criminal evidence (eg. steel) offshore to Asia as soon as logistics allowed, without investigation ?
  • why have so many people suffered cancer, and why not the type associated with asbesthos and jet-fuel ?
    • if counting on jet-fuel as cancer-reason, how could jet-fuel that mostly burned in the initial impact, (and than in the office fires) have contributed so heavily ?
    • make sure to explain the reason behind blood cancer
  • why WTC7 fell ?
    • why WTC7 fell so quickly, near free-fall speed ?
  • explain the seizmic peak before the towers fell

How can you verify very quickly that it is absolutely impossible that the Government's Official Conspiracy Theory (911Report.pdf) holds ?

  • prove that the official report paints a physically impossible scenario
    • note that this does not prove that any other theory is correct, but at least you'll have a good idea on what could have happened.
    • While investigating, you'll certainly learn that the government and the media fooled you bad. This is probably the most important lesson.
gravitational progressive Pencake collapse MRR (tip-down) cone
collapse timeframe 20+ seconds (probably 40+) appr 10 seconds
concrete pulverized to fine dust 1..10% 60+ %
remaining concrete mostly sandwiched at the bottom, appr 15..30 storeys, cracked, but there most of the concrete not found at the bottom, but scattered by the pyroclastic cloud
furniture flattened and shattered between sandwiched concrete vaporize
people flattened and shattered between sandwiched concrete, starts rotting after the event vaporize; mostly just bone fragments remain; not even much of that
steel core stays there; maybe damaged and buckling; does not evaporate some evaporate, some turns to dust, some ends up as molten pool
steel outer walls at the bottom keeps standing with the whole outer walls (if just floors fall) or flattened remain standing (with the top of the outer wall missing)
dust cloud very small mass; slowly expanding; does not burn cars in the parking lot violent, hot, qucikly expanding (40km/h) pyroclastic cloud burning cars in the parking lot
Seismic wave < Magnitude 2 ; at the end of the fall Magnitude 2.1 just prior to the collapse
initiation of collapse does not happen does happen
responsible someone behind hijackers; and maybe engineers cabal that has access to USA military WMD

Just look at the amount of rubbish and characteristics.


  • NIST (National Institute for Standards and Technology, USA) does not know the unit of energy (1 J = 1 Joule = 1 Nm = 1Ws ; 3600000 J = 1kWh)
    • 20 million USD spent on the study was not enough for them to ask someone about the unit of Energy. NIST only writes that "tremendous energy", without an attempt to quantify
    • those who quantified, found that the gravitional energy is not enough to pulverize the amount of concrete that was pulverized, and warm the cloud to the temperature neccessary for the quick expand of the cloud (and burn a parking lot of cars nearby). In fact it is not enough to any of them alone. TODO: google for "north tower dust cloud"


What is an MRR cone ? A major research target since the 1950s is to make H-bomb with "Minimal Residual Radiation" (obviously triggered by something else than an atomic bomb: maybe laser, or plasma created by concentrated electric arc, maybe with the help of some chemical agents and/or anti-matter). The other research target was to direct most of the energy into a cone (rather than a spherically uniform), this is useful (among many things as) a bunker-buster. The fact they didn't tell you their results doesn't mean they haven't done it. Informed experts suggest the technology has been available since around 1990. Without MRR, you will find it extremely hard or rather impossible to explain the perceived phenomena at WTC towers 1,2,7.

http://www.rense.com/general69/598467.jpg

Remember, 'pure' hydrogen bomb, so no uranium or plutonium at all. The basic nuclear reaction is Deuterium + Tritium Alpha + n.

Search the Web for:

  • hydrogen bomb wtc


Back to YourGuideToFreedom