Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia sysop power structure"
From Anarchopedia
(response) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The sysop power structure of Wikipedia is to put it very simply, fascistic. Would be users are banned by ISP address and user name, (even if the computer they are using is a public one; i.e., in a library), and can be banned infintely. The admins are self-important and spiteful; they will edit out perfectly useful and accurate information because of 'guilt by association'; again a banned ISP number or name. Self-appointed Little | + | The sysop power structure of [[Wikipedia]] is to put it very simply, fascistic. Would-be users are banned by [[ISP address]] and user name, (even if the [[computer]] they are using is a [[public]] one; i.e., in a [[library]]), and can be banned infintely. The [[admins]] are self-important and spiteful; they will edit out perfectly useful and accurate [[information]] because of 'guilt by association'; again a banned ISP number or name. Self-appointed Little [[God]]s. Anarchopedia should contrast this with free and open access to all. [[Power to the People]]! |
| − | *Perhaps! But what do you mean by "guilt by association"? Could someone give an example of information that would not apear on Wikipedia because of this guilt? (I'm not speaking rhetorically, just so you know.) | + | *On October 10, 2005, Anarchopedia experienced the biggest attack on its sovereignty yet when a Wikipedia user known as [[Stalinist Administrator]] replaced the [[Main Page]] and declared himself owner of the website. |
| + | *'' The admins are self-important and spiteful; they will edit out perfectly useful and accurate information because of 'guilt by association''. Perhaps! But what do you mean by "guilt by association"? Could someone give an example of information that would not apear on Wikipedia because of this guilt? (I'm not speaking rhetorically, just so you know.) | ||
Revision as of 13:58, 11 May 2006
The sysop power structure of Wikipedia is to put it very simply, fascistic. Would-be users are banned by ISP address and user name, (even if the computer they are using is a public one; i.e., in a library), and can be banned infintely. The admins are self-important and spiteful; they will edit out perfectly useful and accurate information because of 'guilt by association'; again a banned ISP number or name. Self-appointed Little Gods. Anarchopedia should contrast this with free and open access to all. Power to the People!
- On October 10, 2005, Anarchopedia experienced the biggest attack on its sovereignty yet when a Wikipedia user known as Stalinist Administrator replaced the Main Page and declared himself owner of the website.
- The admins are self-important and spiteful; they will edit out perfectly useful and accurate information because of 'guilt by association. Perhaps! But what do you mean by "guilt by association"? Could someone give an example of information that would not apear on Wikipedia because of this guilt? (I'm not speaking rhetorically, just so you know.)
