Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of shock sites"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Banned?)
(Encyclopedia Dramatica: new section)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
:Banned? As in [[censorship|censored]]? I think you are in the wrong place, please go back to [[Conservopedia]]. &nbsp;~&nbsp;[[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA!&nbsp;V&nbsp;Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit&section=new}} Talk]</sup></span> [[2009]] [[December 25]] 07:05 <sub>([[Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]])</sub>
 
:Banned? As in [[censorship|censored]]? I think you are in the wrong place, please go back to [[Conservopedia]]. &nbsp;~&nbsp;[[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA!&nbsp;V&nbsp;Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit&section=new}} Talk]</sup></span> [[2009]] [[December 25]] 07:05 <sub>([[Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]])</sub>
 +
 +
== Encyclopedia Dramatica ==
 +
 +
I've rolled back the addition of [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]] to this list. It's by no means a shock site; the fact that somebody can find something offensive there is not a reason to add it here. ED clearly states what it is for and is not intended to lure people in with the false sense of security, rather it is the encyclopedia written in a different format than [[Wikipedia]] or [[Anarchopedia]]. &nbsp;~&nbsp;[[User:Beta_M|User:]][[Buddhism|B]][[ethics|e]][[Taoism|t]][[anarchism|a]][[postmodernism|_]][[metaphysics|M]] (VolodyA!&nbsp;V&nbsp;Anarhist) <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"><sup>[{{fullurl:User_talk:Beta_M|action=edit&section=new}} Talk]</sup></span> [[2010]] [[January 12]] 09:34 <sub>([[Coordinated Universal Time|UTC]])</sub>

Revision as of 09:34, 12 January 2010

I would keep this because it's one of the few popular and maintained pages here. Also it's useful for many sensitive persons to know about shock sites, to understand their content or avoid them. ~Rev 22 19:14, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

This page MUST stay! There are only very few compiled lists of shocksites. Many other sites just copy wiki's and wiki doesnt even allow editing that listing. Please keep "shock sites"!

I believe i was the person who's copied the starting list from Wikipedia, and i believe that it should stay here. For one thing there's a reason given by anonymous above, and then it does have something to do with anarchism, specifically with the public perception of anarchism. What should happen imho is for us to create a good article about shock site, i'm going to make a mental note of that for myself.  ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) Talk 2009 December 20 14:22 (UTC)

NO

no please. this diverts many teenagers thoughts to the negative ones.........

this kind of websites too must be banned from the internet, because this is not the reason for which we had it. we thought this would improve the knowledge of our race...humans.but what we are doing here with those sites.....[disturbing other good people by the already disturbed ones......].please spread this message after you reading this.

Banned? As in censored? I think you are in the wrong place, please go back to Conservopedia.  ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) Talk 2009 December 25 07:05 (UTC)

Encyclopedia Dramatica

I've rolled back the addition of Encyclopedia Dramatica to this list. It's by no means a shock site; the fact that somebody can find something offensive there is not a reason to add it here. ED clearly states what it is for and is not intended to lure people in with the false sense of security, rather it is the encyclopedia written in a different format than Wikipedia or Anarchopedia.  ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) Talk 2010 January 12 09:34 (UTC)