Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of shock sites"
(→NO: new section) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
no please. this diverts many teenagers thoughts to the negative ones......... | no please. this diverts many teenagers thoughts to the negative ones......... | ||
| + | |||
| + | this kind of websites too must be banned from the internet, because this is not the reason for which we had it. we thought this would improve the knowledge of our race...humans.but what we are doing here with those sites.....[disturbing other good people by the already disturbed ones......].please spread this message after you reading this. | ||
Revision as of 08:53, 24 December 2009
I would keep this because it's one of the few popular and maintained pages here. Also it's useful for many sensitive persons to know about shock sites, to understand their content or avoid them. ~Rev 22 19:14, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
This page MUST stay! There are only very few compiled lists of shocksites. Many other sites just copy wiki's and wiki doesnt even allow editing that listing. Please keep "shock sites"!
- I believe i was the person who's copied the starting list from Wikipedia, and i believe that it should stay here. For one thing there's a reason given by anonymous above, and then it does have something to do with anarchism, specifically with the public perception of anarchism. What should happen imho is for us to create a good article about shock site, i'm going to make a mental note of that for myself. ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) 2009 December 20 14:22 (UTC)
NO
no please. this diverts many teenagers thoughts to the negative ones.........
this kind of websites too must be banned from the internet, because this is not the reason for which we had it. we thought this would improve the knowledge of our race...humans.but what we are doing here with those sites.....[disturbing other good people by the already disturbed ones......].please spread this message after you reading this.
