Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.

Euthanasia and the 'Slippery Slope'

From Anarchopedia
Revision as of 19:33, 27 March 2011 by 85.210.36.239 (Talk) (The empirical argument)

Jump to: navigation, search

This article contains content from Wikipedia. It was nominated for deletion on Wikipedia

Critics of euthanasia sometimes claim that legalising any form of the practice will lead to a slippery slope effect, resulting eventually in non-voluntary or even Wikipedia:involuntary euthanasia. The slippery slope argument has been present in the euthanasia debate since at least the 1930s.[1]

Lawyer Eugene Volokh argued in his article The Mechanism of the Slippery Slope that judicial logic could eventually lead to a gradual break in the legal restrictions for euthanasia,[2] while medical oncologist and palliative care specialist, Jan Bernheim, believes the law can provide safeguards against slippery-slope effects, saying that the grievances of euthanasia opponents are unfounded.[3]




References

  1. Demetra, (1996). "Recent historical perspectives regarding medical euthanasia and physician assisted suicide," British medical bulletin, 52, 389.
  2. Eugene Volokh, 'The Mechanisms of the Slippery Slope', 116 Harvard Law Review 1026 (2003) [1] Template:JSTOR
  3. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Laws_can_safeguard_the_dying

Template:Death