Category talk:Notable Mutualists

Notable

I don't really like the term "Notable" as it's very subjective and probably depends on whom you ask to define the term. I think we should just stick to calling it Mutualists.  ~ User:Beta_M (VolodyA! V Anarhist) ^Talk 2007 December 23 15:37 _(UTC)

RE: "Notable?" ~ User:joel.davis Well my intention with "notable" was mostly to just indicate not just run-of-the-mill mutualists, or people who just happen to be considered mutualist but are worthy of a page for other reasons. So basically I was running low on other qualifiers and just anticipated "notable" would be interpreted as meaning someone who has done work in the field, I'm not married to the idea though if you want to change it.