User talk:Complacency is insanity - Revision history

XXPowerMexicoXx: Undo revision 46097 by Complacency is insanity (Talk)

2011-07-25T01:59:59Z

Undo revision 46097 by Complacency is insanity (Talk)

Complacency is insanity: Protected "User talk:Complacency is insanity": Excessive vandalism: repeated harassment by my longtime personal vandal, 85.210.x.x ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

2011-01-28T22:15:28Z

Protected "User talk:Complacency is insanity": Excessive vandalism: repeated harassment by my longtime personal vandal, 85.210.x.x ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

Complacency is insanity: rv deceptive harassment by my longtime personal vandal, 85.210.x.x

2011-01-28T22:12:35Z

rv deceptive harassment by my longtime personal vandal, 85.210.x.x

85.210.200.161: /* Latin grammar */ new section

2011-01-27T23:46:25Z

‎Latin grammar: new section

Complacency is insanity: Undo revision 45759 by Krähe (Talk)

2011-01-05T15:31:21Z

Undo revision 45759 by Krähe (Talk)

KrÃ¤he: fuck you very much

2011-01-05T12:25:16Z

fuck you very much

Complacency is insanity at 04:16, 5 January 2011

2011-01-05T04:16:04Z

KrÃ¤he at 14:56, 31 December 2010

2010-12-31T14:56:07Z

Complacency is insanity at 07:12, 28 October 2010

2010-10-28T07:12:17Z

MrDog at 19:57, 27 October 2010

2010-10-27T19:57:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:59, 25 July 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)		:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	There is a talk page for such nonsense. Thanks. Please stop vandalizing and spreading overcome dogma. For your "critique", quote (1) has a linked context, quote (2) too. If you want the one who argues like "I am a authority, it's true because i say so" in this case... look in the mirror. Also, please note there is no talk of "macroraces" but of populations. Important difference. And besides that, what kind of anarchist are you anyway, that you have to defend the concept of distinct "races" even against the scientific current? [[User:KrÃ¤he\|KrÃ¤he]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 28 January 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)		:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
−
−	~~== Latin grammar ==~~
−
−	~~So, Mr Insanity, just why ''did'' you stop thinking the grammar of dead languages is junk knowledge?~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:46, 27 January 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)		:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Latin grammar ==
		+
		+	So, Mr Insanity, just why ''did'' you stop thinking the grammar of dead languages is junk knowledge?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:31, 5 January 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)		:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
−
−	There is a talk page for such nonsense. Thanks. Please stop vandalizing and spreading overcome dogma. For your "critique", quote (1) has a linked context, quote (2) too. If you want the one who argues like "I am a authority, it's true because i say so" in this case... look in the mirror. Also, please note there is no talk of "macroraces" but of populations. Important difference. And besides that, what kind of anarchist are you anyway, that you have to defend the concept of distinct "races" even against the scientific current? [[User:KrÃ¤he\|KrÃ¤he]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 5 January 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)		:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

−	There is a talk page for my nonsense. Thanks. Please stop ~~preventing me from~~ vandalizing and spreading overcome dogma. For your "critique", quote (1) has a linked context, quote (2) too. If you want the one who argues like "I am a authority, it's true because i say so" in this case... look in the mirror. Also, please note there is no talk of "macroraces" but of populations. Important difference. And besides that, what kind of anarchist are you anyway, that you have to defend the concept of distinct "races" even against the scientific current? [[User:KrÃ¤he\|KrÃ¤he]]	+	There is a talk page for such nonsense. Thanks. Please stop vandalizing and spreading overcome dogma. For your "critique", quote (1) has a linked context, quote (2) too. If you want the one who argues like "I am a authority, it's true because i say so" in this case... look in the mirror. Also, please note there is no talk of "macroraces" but of populations. Important difference. And besides that, what kind of anarchist are you anyway, that you have to defend the concept of distinct "races" even against the scientific current? [[User:KrÃ¤he\|KrÃ¤he]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:15, 28 January 2011
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:16, 5 January 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)		:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

−	There is a talk page for ~~such~~ nonsense. Thanks. Please stop vandalizing and spreading overcome dogma. For your "critique", quote (1) has a linked context, quote (2) too. If you want the one who argues like "I am a authority, it's true because i say so" in this case... look in the mirror. Also, please note there is no talk of "macroraces" but of populations. Important difference. And besides that, what kind of anarchist are you anyway, that you have to defend the concept of distinct "races" even against the scientific current? [[User:KrÃ¤he\|KrÃ¤he]]	+	There is a talk page for my nonsense. Thanks. Please stop preventing me from vandalizing and spreading overcome dogma. For your "critique", quote (1) has a linked context, quote (2) too. If you want the one who argues like "I am a authority, it's true because i say so" in this case... look in the mirror. Also, please note there is no talk of "macroraces" but of populations. Important difference. And besides that, what kind of anarchist are you anyway, that you have to defend the concept of distinct "races" even against the scientific current? [[User:KrÃ¤he\|KrÃ¤he]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 31 December 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)		:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	There is a talk page for such nonsense. Thanks. Please stop vandalizing and spreading overcome dogma. For your "critique", quote (1) has a linked context, quote (2) too. If you want the one who argues like "I am a authority, it's true because i say so" in this case... look in the mirror. Also, please note there is no talk of "macroraces" but of populations. Important difference. And besides that, what kind of anarchist are you anyway, that you have to defend the concept of distinct "races" even against the scientific current? [[User:KrÃ¤he\|KrÃ¤he]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:12, 28 October 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Full protection of every single page that you edit or create with no expiry set against an easily revertible vandal is a little over the top for this site.		Full protection of every single page that you edit or create with no expiry set against an easily revertible vandal is a little over the top for this site.
		+
		+	:If you had done a range block on the vandal, as is your responsibility as a sysop, or if you had given me the sysop abilities to block the vandal myself as I had specifically asked you to, then I would not have protected those articles because it would not have been necessary. So don't try to make it look like that was my first choice of action. [[User:Complacency is insanity\|Complacency is insanity]] 07:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:57, 27 October 2010
Line 1:	Line 1:
−	+	Full protection of every single page that you edit or create with no expiry set against an easily revertible vandal is a little over the top for this site.